Ben Shafton

Attorney in Vancouver, WA
Co-Author, "Manual for Representation of Witnesses Called Before Federal Grand Juries," 1st Ed., 1974. Member, Clark County Planning Commission, 1992-1996. Selected as a Super Lawyer by Washington Law and Politics, 2003.
Free Consultation
  • Business Litigation
  • Commercial Law
  • Municipal Law
  • Real Estate
  • Appellate Practice
  • Insurance
  • Personal Injury
  • Accidents
  • Construction Law
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Litigation
  • Trucking Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Administrative Hearings and Appeals


Overall Client Rating

in General Practice
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 03/20/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1973, California
1975, Washington
1979, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
1984, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
1986, Oregon
1992, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington
2002, U.S. Supreme Court

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    University of California at Berkeley
    Class of 1973

    University Attended

    Yale University
    Class of 1970
    cum laude

    Birth Information

    Born in 1947
    Omaha, Nebraska, December 9, 1947

    Associations & Memberships

    Clark County (Chairman: Indigent Defense Committee, 1980-1984; Bench Bar Committee, 1984-1986) and Washington State Bar Associations; Oregon State Bar; State Bar of California; Washington State Tri... More

    Bar Fellowship

    American College of Trial Lawyers.

    Representative Cases

    State v. Hall, 104 Wn.2d 486, 706 P.2d 1074, 1985; In Re: Hagen, 21 Wn. App. 169, 584 P.2d 446, 1978; Henery v. Robinson, 67 Wn. App. 2 77, 834 P.2d 1091, 1992; Barney v. Safeco Ins., 73 Wn. App. 426, 869 P. 1093, 1994; Port of Longview v. International Raw Materials, 96 Wn. App. 431, 979 P.2d 917 (1999); Wiley v. Rehak, 143 Wn. 2d 339, 20 P.3d 404... More

    Hobbies & Interests

    Music and Travel.

    Contact Information




    Send email to Ben Shafton

    Office Information
    Ben Shafton
    Riverview Bank Tower 900 Washington Street, Suite 1000,
    Vancouver, WA 98660-3455


    Caron Colven Robison & Shafton P.S. (Vancouver, Washington)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.