Brent Ratekin

Attorney in Tyler, TX
Alpha Phi Sigma. Member: National Criminal Justice Honor Society; Board of Barristers; President Federalist Society Texas Tech. Formerly with Sinclair Law Office; Smith County District Attorney's Office. Former Police Officer.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

Criminal LawFamily Law
Criminal Law
Family Law
Other Areas of Law
Child Abuse and Neglect, Child Custody, Assault, Theft, Traffic Violations, Child Support, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Drug Crimes, DUI/DWI, Expungements, Felonies, Weapons Charges, Juvenile Law, Law Enforcement, Methamphetamine, Crimes, Misdemeanors, Probation, Premarital Agreements, Restraining Orders, Sex Crimes, Spousal Support, Visitation


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2004, Texas

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    Texas Tech University School of Law
    Class of 2004

    University Attended

    Sam Houston State University
    Class of 2001
    Criminal Justice, summa cum laude

    Birth Information

    Born in 1967
    Rome, New York, December 11, 1967


    Aircraft Mechanic, Staff Sergeant, E-5, Air Force, 1986-1990

    Associations & Memberships

    Smith County Bar Association; State Bar of Texas; Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association; Smith County Criminal Defense Lawyers Association; Smith County Bar Foundation (Member, Sections on: ... More

    Contact Information


    903-595-1516 Call Now




    Send email to Brent Ratekin

    Office Information
    Brent Ratekin
     422 S. Spring Avenue,
    Tyler, TX 75702


    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.