Victor R. Seagle

Attorney in Tulsa, OK
Phi Delta Phi. Judge, Workers' Compensation Court of Oklahoma, 1981-1991.
Free Consultation
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Workers Compensation


    Peer Rating


    Overall Peer Rating

    5.0 out of 5.0
    • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
    No feedback is available.
    The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

    Experience & Credentials


    Senior Attorney

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1976, Oklahoma
    1978, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
    1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

    Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    University of Tulsa
    Class of 1975

    University Attended

    University of Tulsa
    Class of 1967

    Birth Information

    Born in 1945
    Lynchburg, Virginia, March 28, 1945

    Associations & Memberships

    Oklahoma County, Tulsa and Oklahoma (Member, Workers' Compensation Section) Bar Associations; International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions; Western and Southern Asso... More

    Representative Cases

    Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Berg, 2004 OK CIV. APP. 89, 99 P.3d 1205; Diversified Rubber v. Harvey, 2003 OK CIV. App. 67, 74 P.3d 619; Special Indemnity Fund v. Figgins, 1992 OK 59, 831 P.2d 1379; Richardson v. Bartlett Collins Co., 1999 OK CIV. APP. 105, 990 P.2d 305.

    Contact Information


    918-382-1400 Call Now




    Send email to Victor R. Seagle

    Office Information
    Victor R. Seagle
    Senior Attorney
     1800 S. Baltimore Ave., Suite 900,
    Tulsa, OK 74119


    Perrine, Redemann Berry & Taylor, PLLC (Tulsa, Oklahoma)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.