N. Scott Johnson

Attorney in Tulsa, OK
Phi Alpha Delta. Recipient, American Jurisprudence Award, Family Law. President, Student Bar Association, University of Tulsa, 1991-1992. Member, Board of Directors, Alumni Association, University of Tulsa College of Law, 1997-1999. Associate Member, American Inns of Court, 2000—.

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Appellate Practice


Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 12/22/14
Posted by a Consumer on 12/22/14
5.0 out of 5.0
If you are serious about getting maximum value (and best chance for success) for your money and getting the best legal representation possible for your divorce or custody battle then hire Scott Johnson. He's not cheap but you get what you pay for. Some of the best money I ever spent. Oh yeah, Scott doesn't sugar-coat anything either - pretty refreshing.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1992, Oklahoma

Law School Attended

University of Tulsa
Class of 1992
with honors

University Attended

Oklahoma State University
Class of 1988

Birth Information

Born in 1966
Tulsa, Oklahoma, July 18, 1966

Associations & Memberships

Tulsa County (Member, Professional Responsibility Committee; Secretary, Family Law Section, 2000—), Oklahoma (Member, Board of Directors, Young Lawyers Division, 1996-2001) and American ... More

Bar Fellowship

American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

Contact Information



Office Information
N. Scott Johnson
 1303 East 17th Place,
Tulsa, OK 74120


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.