Michael F. Smith

Attorney in Tulsa, OK

Michael F. Smith is a trial and appellate lawyer specializing in defending manufacturers and other suppliers and distributors of products, including automobiles, cranes, forklifts, pharmaceuticals, and implanted medical devices. He has also defended accounting firms and law firms in professional malpractice actions.

Michael is admitted to practice in Oklahoma, Illinois, and New York and has represented clients in state and federal trial and appellate courts throughout the United States. He is particularly regarded for his expertise with appellate practice and procedure in the Oklahoma Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and has had primary briefing responsibilities on a broad range of cases, including those involving products liability, professional malpractice, employment and environmental matters.

As part of his appellate practice, Michael has successfully defended judgments, based on both summary judgments and jury verdicts, in numerous appeals in state and federal courts throughout the United States, including appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court. Many of those appeals involved issues of first impression, and the reported opinions in those cases have established new precedent on a variety of legal issues.

His achievements as a trial and appellate lawyer have earned him inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America (commercial litigation) and Oklahoma Super Lawyers as well as the honor of membership in the International Association of Defense Counsel, where he serves as the vice chair for Web Site and Social Media for the Appellate Practice Committee. Michael serves as the chair-elect of the Oklahoma Bar Association's appellate practice committee and is an active member in the American Inns of Court Council Oak/Johnson-Sontag Chapter.

Active in the community, Michael serves as general counsel and vice president of the board of directors of Oklahomans for Equality, a nonprofit organization which seeks equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals and families through advocacy, education, programs, alliances and the operation of the Dennis R. Neill Equality Center. He also serves on the board of directors of the Oklahoma Center for Community and Justice, a nonprofit organization dedicated to fighting bias, bigotry and racism by promoting understanding and respect among all races, religions and cultures through advocacy, conflict resolution and education.

Representative Experience

· Wrote successful motion for summary judgment in state court for national accounting firm in professional malpractice action brought by a large bank arising out of the failure of a startup airline. Successfully defended on appeal to the Oklahoma Supreme Court the trial court's order granting summary judgment.

· Wrote successful post-trial motion for new trial in federal court for an automobile manufacturer vacating a $15,000,000 verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a case where the plaintiffs alleged that their 18-year-old son died as a result of inadequate roof strength in a single vehicle rollover crash.

· Successfully defended on appeal in state court a verdict and judgment in favor of an automobile manufacturer in a case involving a head-on collision resulting in five deaths. The plaintiffs challenged the verdict and judgment alleging juror misconduct, improper non-uniform jury instructions, and a variety of evidentiary errors. Plaintiffs pursued the appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

· Wrote successful motion in federal court striking the plaintiff's expert's opinions based on the sham affidavit rule, and successfully defended the court's order striking those opinions on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

· Wrote briefing in an interlocutory appeal successfully vacating a trial court's order sanctioning a manufacturer defendant in excess of $100,000 based on the plaintiff's unfounded argument that counsel for the manufacturer violated the trial court's in limine order excluding evidence of alcohol.

· Wrote successful motion for summary judgment in federal court based on the plaintiff's experts' failure to establish that an alleged defect caused the plaintiff's injuries in an action where the plaintiff alleged an airbag failed to deploy. Also successfully defended the trial court's judgment in the plaintiff's appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

· Obtained summary judgment in favor of a major automobile manufacturer after successfully excluding plaintiff's expert testimony in a case where a product defect was alleged to be responsible for a catastrophic brain injury of an 8-year-old. Judgment affirmed on appeal to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

· Provided legal advice to a national telematics service provider regarding potential liability exposure arising out of contracts to provide emergency medical services, including emergency medical dispatch, and pre-arrival instructions, through satellite and cellular technology installed in automobiles.

· Provided legal advice to a national telematics service provider regarding international expansion into Middle Eastern countries.

· Provided legal advice to a national telematics service provider regarding state and local emergency medical services statutes, regulations, and relevant case law in all 50 states.

· Provided legal advice to singer/songwriter/performer regarding trademark infringement issues involving early unauthorized releases of her first album.

· Wrote successful motion for summary judgment in state court based on plaintiffs' experts' failure to establish causation in a manufacturers' products liability action alleging that an airbag failed to deploy in a multiple vehicle crash. Successfully defended the trial court's order on appeal to the Oklahoma Supreme Court.

· Successfully defended local employer in wrongful termination litigation before the Oklahoma Employment and Security Commission.

· Wrote successful motion in state court, affirmed on appeal, striking the plaintiff's class action allegations in consumer litigation arising out of prepaid calling cards.

· Successfully defended on appeal in state court a defense verdict and judgment in favor of an automobile manufacturer in litigation where the plaintiff alleged his wife suffered fatal injuries due to inadequate seat-back strength.

· Written hundreds of motions in limine and motions for summary judgment in state and federal courts challenging engineering experts' opinion testimony for lack of scientific methodology pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and FED. R. EVID. 702.

· Wrote successful petition for permission for interlocutory appeal to the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in litigation involving question of whether a group of plaintiff's could utilize Title VII's pattern or practice procedure in litigation arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

· Briefed interlocutory appeal to the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding novel questions arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

· Briefed interlocutory appeal to the Oklahoma Supreme Court on issues related to the common law tort of wrongful discharge in violation of Oklahoma public policy under Burk v. K-Mart Corp.

· Wrote successful trial and appellate court briefing involving novel issues of lender liability, and the applicable, and accrual of, statute of limitations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

· Written hundreds of motions in limine on complex topics to exclude all types of evidence in hundreds of lawsuits against manufacturers of all types of products, including automobiles, cranes, tractors, forklifts, implanted medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.

· Written numerous successful motions to dismiss international defendants based on the plaintiffs' failure to comply with the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters.

· Litigated all types of discovery disputes in complex litigation.

· Provided legal research and writing in all phases of defending complex litigation including answers, motions to dismiss, motions to quash, motions to compel, motions for summary judgment, motions in limine, Daubert motions, bench briefs, jury instructions, verdict forms, post-trial trial motions for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and appellate briefing.

· Served as primary briefing counsel on numerous cases, including:

- Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2011 OK CIV APP 56, 251 P.3d 187

- BancFirst ex rel. Estate of M.J.H. v. Ford Motor Co., No. 10-6137, 2011 WL 1462279 (10th Cir. April 18, 2011)

- Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, No. CJ-2007-816, 2010 WL 749067 (Okla. Dist. Ct. Tulsa County Jan. 25, 2010)

- Teters v. Ford Motor Co., No. 104,801, slip op. (Okla. Civ. App. Feb. 2, 2009), cert. denied (Okla. May 18, 2009)

- Thompson v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 582 F.3d 1125 (10th Cir. 2009)

- Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. DF-104134, slip op. (Okla. Civ. App. Nov. 7, 2008), cert. denied (Okla. Feb. 17, 2009), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 130 S. Ct. 93 (Oct. 5, 2009)

- Kruchowski v. The Weyerhaeuser Co., 202 P.3d 144 (Okla. 2008)

- Ruminer v. General Motors Corp., 483 F.3d 561 (8th Cir. 2007)

- Moody v. Ford Motor Co., 506 F. Supp. 2d 823 (N.D. Okla. 2007)

- Moody v. Ford Motor Co., No. 03-CV-784-GKF-PJC, 2007 WL 3046662 (N.D. Okla. Oct. 16, 2007)

- Moody v. Ford Motor Co., No. 03-CV-784-CVE-PJC, 2007 WL 1791114 (N.D. Okla. June 18, 2007)

- Nash v. General Motors Corp., 153 P.3d 73 (Okla. Civ. App. 2007)

- Alfaro v. General Motors Corp., No. 05CV00645 MSKBNB, 2006 WL 2982849 (D. Colo. Oct. 17, 2006)

- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Hans Lingl Anlagenbau Und Verfahrenstechnik GMBH & Co. KG, 189 Fed. Appx. 782, 2006 WL 2065069 (10th Cir. 2006)

- Kruchowski v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 446 F.3d 1090 (10th Cir. 2006)

- Ruminer v. General Motors Corp., No. 4:03-CV-349-GTE, 2006 WL 287945 (E.D. Ark. 2006)

- Kruchowski v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 423 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2005)

- Sagona v. Sun Co., Inc., 57 P.3d 879 (Okla. Civ. App. 2002)

- Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 263 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2001)

- Griffin v. Steeltek, Inc., 261 F.3d 1026 (10th Cir. 2001)

- Hutchinson v. Carter, 33 P.3d 958 (Okla. Civ. App. 2001)

- Deerinwater v. Circus Circus Enterprises, 21 P.3d 646 (Okla. Civ. App. 2001)

- State ex rel. Fisher v. South Atlantic Dredging Co., Inc., 15 P.3d 523, (Okla. Civ. App. 2000)

- Johnston v. Volunteers of America Oklahoma, Inc., 213 F.3d 559 (10th Cir. 2000)

- Sias v. Edge Communications, Inc., 8 P.3d 182 (Okla. Civ. App. 2000), cert. denied, May 9, 2000

- Lawson v. National Steel Erectors Corp., 8 P.3d 171 (Okla. Civ. App. 2000)

- Hoar v. Aetna Casualty & Ins. Co., 968 P.2d 1219 (Okla. 1998)

- Hervey v. Dyer, 972 P.2d 42 (Okla. Ct. App. 1998)

- Sun Co. Inc., (R & M) v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 124 F.3d 1187 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1113 (1998)

- Bethesda Boys Ranch v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 208 B.R. 980 (N.D. Okla. 1997)

- Dennis v. Harding Glass Co., 929 P.2d 301 (Okla. Ct. App. 1996)

- May v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 84 F.3d 1342 (10th Cir. 1996)

- May v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 918 P.2d 43 (Okla. 1996)

- Board of Educ. of Tp. High School Dist. No. 205 v. Leininger, 822 F. Supp. 516 (N.D. Ill. 1993)

Attorney Articles

· Caller beware: Written consent now required for automated telemarketing calls!
McAfee & Taft Business Law Alert - October 15, 2013

· Interlocutory Orders Appealable by Right
Oklahoma Bar Journal - Vol. 84, No. 27 - October 12, 2013

· Watch what you say
The Journal Record - January 26, 2012

· From deference to contempt
IADC Committee Newsletter - November 2011

· Duty to Defend (Chapter 4)
Law and Practice of Insurance Coverage Litigation, a publication of the American Bar Association Tort and Insurance Practice Section - 2000

· Fifty State Construction Lien and Bond Law
Aspen Law and Business - 2000

· Is direct-to-consumer advertising eroding the learned intermediary doctrine?
For the Defense Vol. 41, No. 12 - December 1999

· State-by-State Guide to Architect, Engineer and Contractor Licensing, Oklahoma Chapter
Aspen Law and Business - 1999

· The Evolution of PRP Standing Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980
21 William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review 300 - 1997

· Baker v. Arbor Drugs, Inc.: Pharmacies beware of voluntarily assuming the duty to protect against harmful drug interactions
14 Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 41 - 1997

· Limiting liability of the passive lender under the comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
26 Tulsa Law Journal 75 - 1990

In The News

· New FCC Telemarketing Rules and the $1,500 Phone Call
Corporate Counsel - October 16, 2013

· Michael Smith elected OBA Appellate Practice Section chairperson-elect
Tulsa, OK - February 12, 2013

Professional Organizations And Memberships

· Tulsa County Bar Association

· Oklahoma Bar Association (Chair Elect, Appellate Practice Committee)

· International Association of Defense Counsel (Vice Chair, Web Site and Social Media for the Appellate Practice Committee)

· Defense Research Institute

· American Inns of Court, Council Oak/Johnson-Sontag Chapter

Civic Involvement And Leadership

· Oklahomans for Equality (General Counsel; Vice President of the Board of Directors, 2011-2012; Trustees Committee Chairperson, 2006 - 2011)

· Vocal Pride Foundation (General Counsel)

· Oklahoma Center for Community and Justice (Board of Directors)

(918) 574-3078
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Environmental Law
  • Environmental Litigation
  • Litigation
  • Complex Business Litigation
  • Product Liability Defense
  • Mass Torts Litigation
  • Manufacturing and Logistics


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

4.4 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials


Of Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in 1991, Oklahoma
1992, Illinois
2002, New York
U.S. District Court for the Western, Northern and Eastern Districts of Oklahoma
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
U.S. Courts of Appeal for the Eighth and Tenth Circuits
U.S. Supreme Court

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Tulsa
    Class of 1991
    with distinction, Notes & Comments Editor, Tulsa Law Journal, Robert C. Butler, Jr. Award for Excellence in Legal Scholarship and Writing

    University Attended

    Oklahoma State University
    Class of 1987

    Contact Information


    (918) 574-3078


    (918) 574-3178


    Send email to Michael F. Smith

    Office Information
    Michael F. Smith
    Of Counsel
     1717 S. Boulder, Suite 900,
    Tulsa, OK 74119


    McAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation (Tulsa, Oklahoma)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.