Jessica John Bowman

Attorney in Tulsa, OK
Jessica John Bowman is a trial lawyer whose practice is primarily focused on intellectual property and appellate litigation. In addition to drafting claim-construction briefs, participating inMarkmanhearings, and conducting discovery in patent infringement cases for clients in the oil and gas industry, product manufacturers and service providers, she has successfully defended clients charged with trademark infringement, false advertising, and CAN-SPAM violations. She has also advised national corporations in the foodservice industry on compliance with federal food-labeling requirements and avoidance of state-law false-advertising claims, and has counseled and defended clients who have been targeted by class-action plaintiffs challenging the clients' use of descriptive terms on product labels.

Jessica also maintains an active appellate practice, participating in a wide variety of appeals from state agencies, state courts and federal courts.

Jessica's achievements have earned her inclusion inOklahoma Super Lawyers' list of Oklahoma Rising Stars, which recognizes the state's top up-and-coming attorneys.

Prior to joining McAfee & Taft, Jessica clerked for the Honorable Judge Kenneth Ripple on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Judge Gregory Frizzell at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.

Civic Involvement and Leaderships

•Sustainable Tulsa (Board Intern)

•Tulsa Performing Arts Center (Volunteer)

•Tulsa Zoo (Volunteer)


•Protecting your intangible assets
The Journal Record- June 19, 2014

•'Naturally' confusing
McAfee & Taft tIPsheet- June 2014

•Copyright myths and legends
McAfee & Taft tIPsheet Intellectual Property Newsletter- January 2014

•Copyright myths and legends
The Journal Record- October 17, 2013

•SHARE this photo if you want a lawsuit
McAfee & Taft tIPsheet- August 2013

•It's not easy saying you're green
McAfee & Taft tIPsheet Intellectual Property Newsletter- June 2013

•Picture policies
The Journal Record- March 14, 2013

•Monitoring employees' use of company trademarks in social media
McAfee & Taft tIPsheet- March 2013

•Unlicensed products: A not-so-golden opportunity
McAfee & Taft tIPsheet- August 2012

•Seller beware: In-app purchases by minors may constitute unique, voidable contracts
McAfee & Taft tIPsheet- July 2012

•BLM issues proposed regulations concerning hydraulic fracturing
McAfee & Taft RegLINC- July 2012

•New rule governs designation of critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act
McAfee & Taft RegLINC- July 2012

•FWS guidelines designed to minimize impact of wind energy development projects on wildlife
McAfee & Taft RegLINC- July 2012

•Court dismisses toxic tort case arising from hydraulic fracturing activities
McAfee & Taft RegLINC- July 2012

•Spam, spam, wonderful spam
The Journal Record- May 17, 2012

•Recent developments under the Clean Water Act: Proposed rule modifies cooling-water intake unit requirements
McAfee & Taft RegLINC- September 2011

•Report on carcinogens lists Styrene as 'reasonably anticipated to be human carcinogen'
McAfee & Taft RegLINC- July 2011

•Gavel to Gavel: To kill a mockingbird
The Journal Record- June 9, 2011

•Proposed rulemaking for stormwater management under the Clean Water Act
McAfee & Taft RegLINC- January 2011

(918) 574-3046
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Environmental Law
  • Environmental Litigation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Labor and Employment
  • Appellate Practice
  • Labor Law
  • Employment Law
  • Litigation
  • Complex Business Litigation
  • Native American Litigation


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2009, New York
2011, Oklahoma
U.S. District Courts for the Western and Northern Districts of Oklahoma
U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Seventh and Tenth Circuits

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Illinois
    Class of 2008
    summa cum laude, Order of the Coif, Lectures Editor, University of Illinois Law Review, Best Overall Advocate, Frederick Green Moot Court Competition

    University Attended

    University of Oklahoma
    Class of 2005
    Chemical Engineering, minor in Chemistry

    Associations & Memberships

    Professional Organizations and Memberships

    •Oklahoma Bar Association

    •American Bar Association

    Representative Cases

    REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE : Drafted Markman brief proposing claim constructions for six disputed terms, the majority of which were adopted by the court or otherwise construed in client's favor, resulting in stipulation of dismissal by opposing party.;Successfully opposed motion for preliminary injunction seeking to prohibit alleged misuse of confid... More

    Contact Information


    (918) 574-3046


    (918) 574-3146


    Send email to Jessica John Bowman

    Office Information
    Jessica John Bowman
     1717 S. Boulder, Suite 900,
    Tulsa, OK 74119


    McAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation (Tulsa, Oklahoma)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.