Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP

Law Firm in Toronto, ON
Commercial Litigation Lawyers Toronto.
416-865-9500

About This Firm

Widely recognized as Canada's leading commercial litigation practice, Lenczner Slaght in Toronto has successfully represented clients' interests in complex, high-profile cases across the country, in commercial disputes, class actions, securities litigation, and intellectual property matters, among many others.

The firm's litigators are distinguished by their depth of courtroom experience, appearing regularly at all levels of the federal and provincial courts and before professional and regulatory tribunals, as well as in mediation and arbitration proceedings.

Lenczner Slaght is also known for its wealth of talent: the firm's partners, ranked among the best of their peers nationally, lead a recruitment and mentoring program that attracts gifted litigators who are committed to upholding the highest professional standards.

From commercial disputes, class actions and cross-border disputes to administrative law and professional regulation, Lenczner Slaght brings expert strategy - backed by rigorous research, skilled data management and solid administrative support - to demanding cases in all areas of litigation.

Why do you want Lenczner Slaght on your side?

Experience: We spend more time in court.

Lenczner Slaght is exclusively a litigation firm based in Toronto offering exceptional litigation expertise. We are seasoned trial and appeal lawyers who have honed our skills over many years of challenging, high-profile cases. We have proved our ability to represent our clients where it counts - on our feet in all levels of the courts and before every kind of tribunal.

Talent: We offer unmatched depth.

Our litigation skills and courtroom expertise are unrivalled in Canada. We attract the best in our profession - bright, accomplished young lawyers who are mentored within our firm by top-ranked senior litigators.

Results: We achieve our clients' goals.

We know what it takes to build and present solid, compelling cases. We have the skills and experience to position a case for success, enhance the prospect of a favourable resolution - and achieve positive results in a hearing or trial. We vigorously pursue our clients' goals with creativity and determination, tackling the most complex challenges with a disciplined focus sharpened through years of hands-on experience.

Areas of Law

  • Appeals
  • Class Actions
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Defamation & Media
  • Employment
  • Securities Litigation.
  • Insolvency
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Professional Liability
  • Public & Administrative
 

Overall Client Rating

3.9 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.5
Responsiveness
4.0
Quality of Service
3.5
Value for Money
3.5

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 09/20/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Associate
Associate
Partner
Partner
Associate
Associate
Associate
Partner
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Managing Partner; Founding Partner
Partner
Associate
Associate
Associate
Founding Partner
Associate
Associate
Associate
Counsel
Associate
Associate
Counsel
Associate
Associate
Founding Partner
Partner
Founding Partner
Founding Partner
Associate
Associate
Associate

Firm Details

Year Established

1992

Firm Size

49

Contact Information

Firm Address

Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP
Suite 2600, 130 Adelaide Street West,
Toronto, ON M5H 3P5
Canada

Phone

416-865-9500

Facsimile

416-865-9010

Email

Send email to Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP




About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.