Graham T. Clark LinkedIn

Attorney in Toronto, ON

Graham T. Clark obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree with High Distinction in 1993 at the University of Toronto (International Relations/Political Theory). He then attended Osgoode Hall Law School. Focused on criminal law from the start, he began his courtroom career as a student caseworker in first year (1994). Helping individuals fight back against the overwhelming resources of the crown and police was a profound and rewarding experience that animates his practice to this day.

Articles of clerkship were served at the Crown Law office - Criminal, which handles Ontario's serious Criminal Code appeals and prosecutions of police officers. Called to the Bar in 1998, Mr. Clark immediately went into months of pre-trial motions as a junior defence lawyer on the so-called "Maple Leaf Gardens sex case", and later worked as an associate at Pinkofsky Lockyer before returning to sole practice.

In 1999 Mr. Clark secured the acquittal of a client wrongly accused in a series of bank robberies. The client later sued police civilly. In the result the Supreme Court of Canada recognized in 2007 that police can be sued for negligent investigation.

Some of counsel's reported cases from over the years are available here. In 2005 Mr. Clark succeeded in having his client, the fourth party in the Nancy Kidd Murder of 1999, tried only for manslaughter. The crime was featured on America's Most Wanted. Mr. Clark's client was the only one of the four robbers not convicted of murder and thus not given a life sentence.

In 2009 Mr. Clark was privileged to act as amicus curiae in the so-called Midway murder trial, assisting the principle accused who opted to represent himself. The defence conducted by the non-lawyer accused struck awe in observers including senior counsel. Mr. Clark then went to Durham Region to secure the acquittal of another innocent man, Ray Collingham, on tragically trumped up charges of child sexual abuse.

More recently, Mr. Clark enjoyed the great hospitality of the local bar and bench while appearing on a number of high profile cases in the Superior Court of Justice at North Bay, Ontario. His practice now once again focused in the GTA, Mr. Clark nonetheless still accepts retainers on cases throughout Ontario, as dictated by his clients' needs.

Mr. Clark's practice is based on rigorous preparation through close working relationships with clients, on a foundation of 18 years of strictly criminal law courtroom experience.

Call for a free consultation: 416-531-7321

416-531-7321
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Bail, Trials, Appeals from Conviction or Sentence
  • Criminal Code
  • Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
  • Search and Seizure
  • Restoration of Seized Property
  • Wiretaps
  • Firearms
  • Weapons Offences
  • Homicide
  • Aggravated assault/assault bodily harm
  • Drug Crimes
  • Trafficking
  • Possession for the purpose
  • Proceeds of Crime
  • Domestic Violence
  • Impaired Driving
  • Sex Offences
  • Robbery
  • Break and Enter
  • Fraud
  • Theft
  • Traffic Law
  • Youth Criminal Justice

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Senior Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in 1998, Ontario

Credit Cards Accepted
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Osgoode Hall Law School
    Class of 1996
    LL.B.

    University Attended

    University of Toronto
    Class of 1993
    B.A.
    International Relations and Political Theory, with high distinction

    Birth Information

    Born in 1963
    November 22, 1963

    Representative Cases

    R. v. A.M. [2012] O.J. No. 2413, 2012 ONCA 359; R. v. Tran [2010] O.J. No. 2785, 2010 ONCA 471, 213 C.R.R. (2d) 145, 264 O.A.C. 125, 103 O.R. (3d) 131, 257 C.C.C. (3d) 18, 76 C.R. (6th) 307, 2010 CarswellOnt 4504; R. v. Choudhry [2009] O.J. No. 84 183 C.R.R. (2d) 352; R. v. Ouellet [2006] O.J. No. 1785 ONSupCtJus; R. v. Bui [2005] O.J. No. 744 ONSu... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    416-531-7321

    Mobile

    416-726-4248

    Social Networking



    Office Information
    Graham T. Clark
    Senior Counsel
     559 College Street, Suite 201,
    Toronto, ON M6G 1A9
    Canada
    Loading...


    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.