Gabriela Ramo

Attorney in Toronto, ON
Recipient: C.L. Burton Scholarship, University of Toronto; Alliance Cultural Hispanic Canadian Prize in Latin America Literature, University of Toronto. Author: Numerous Articles Published by Runzheimers; CCH; The Strategy Institute and Baker & McKenzie; Wrote Papers for CBA Conference and Law Society of Upper Canada Seminars. Instructor: Immigration Paralegal Course (Seneca College); Guest Lecturer at University of Western Ontario Law School; Immigration Section of International Business Transactions Course.
416-943-0288
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Immigration and Citizenship Law

     

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Senior Associate

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1992, Ontario

    Credit Cards Accepted
    American Express
    Visa
    Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
    Class of 1990
    LL.B.

    University Attended

    University of Toronto
    Class of 1987
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1964
    Montevideo, Uruguay, November 8, 1964

    Languages

    Spanish, English

    Associations & Memberships

    Ontario Bar Association (Citizenship and Immigration Executive, 1992-2002); International Who's Who of Corporate Immigration Lawyers; Business Law Research (1st, 2nd, 3rd Editions).

    Contact Information

    Phone

    416-943-0288

    Email

    Send email to Gabriela Ramo




    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.