Harold N. Hensel

Attorney in Toms River, NJ

Was admitted to practice law before the New Jersey state courts and the U.S. Federal District Court in 1981. With his 30 years of local legal experience, he has engaged in a diverse general practice caseload including general & personal injury litigation, workers' compensation matters, criminal & municipal court litigation, real estate closings & litigation, wills & estate planning, and zoning & planning matters, representing both applicants and boards. In 1996 the Superior Court appointed Mr. Hensel as Custodial Receiver for the Berkeley Water Company, a local privately-held public utility in Berkeley Township, which he managed until its asset sale in 2005.


Mr. Hensel, born in Toms River and raised in Bayville, New Jersey, began his legal carreer as a law clerk for Carluccio and Liston while attending Seton Hall Law School. As an Associate Editor of the Seton Hall Law Review, he published a casenote on a pending appellate division case, which was subsequently cited by the New Jersey Supreme Court as persuasive authority in deciding that case, and thereafter cited by other leading decisions in that area of the law.


Upon completion of law school, Mr. Hensel worked for ten years first as an associate and then as a partner with Carluccio & Liston and then its successor fIrm, Liston, Hensel & Pinizzotto. During that time, from 1988 through 1990, he was personally designated by the Ocean County Public Defender's Office as a pool attorney. He also served as Berkeley Township Public Defender from 1987 through 1992. At various times his firm represented both the Berkeley Township and Stafford Township Planning Boards, and were named as Municipal Prosecutors in Pemberton Township and Little Egg Harbor Township, for which he assumed primary responsibility.

From 1991 to 2004 Mr. Hensel was a partner with Rumpf & Hensel. During that time, he was a member of the Ocean County District IIIA Ethics Committee (1989-1992), and elected as a member of the Board of Education of the Toms River Regional Schools (1990-1993). In 2005 Mr. Hensel engaged in a solo practice including general & personal injury litigation, workers'
compensation matters, criminal & municipal court litigation, real estate closings & litigation, wills & estate planning, and zoning & planning matters, representing both applicants and boards. He was appointed as Conflict Public Defender for the Lakewood Township Municipal Court and the Manchester Township Municipal Court. He also served as the Manchester Township Zoning Board of Adjustment attorney. In 2009, he merged his practice with the Secare and Ryan law fIrm to form Secare, Ryan & Hensel.

732-504-3081

Areas of Law

  • Workers Compensation
  • Real Estate
  • Zoning, Planning and Land Use
  • Personal Injury
  • Criminal Law

 

Overall Client Rating

5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 09/28/13
Posted by a Consumer on 09/28/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
The office staff was friendly and responsive, Harold was easy to talk to and covered all the bases.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1981, New Jersey and U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey

Law School Attended

Seton Hall Law School
Class of 1981
J.D.

University Attended

Seton Hall University
Class of 1978
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in 1956
Toms River, New Jersey, August 12, 1956

Associations & Memberships

New Jersey State Bar Association.

Contact Information

Phone

732.349.2800 Call Now

Email

Send email to Harold N. Hensel


Office Information
Harold N. Hensel
Member
 16 Madison Avenue, Building I,
Toms River, NJ 08753

Loading...

Logo
Secare and Hensel (Toms River, New Jersey)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.