Diana L. Anderson LinkedIn

Attorney in Toms River, NJ
Certified Elder Law Attorney. Assistant Municipal Attorney, Cherry Hill Township, 1991-1992. Gilroy, Cramer & McLaughlin, 1992-1994. Hiering, Hoffman and Gannon, 1994-2000.
732-606-4083
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

Elder LawEstate Law
Elder Law
60%
Estate Law
40%
Other Areas of Law
Education Law, Special Education, Guardianship and Conservatorship, Adult Guardianship, Advance Directives, Conservatorship, Dependent Adult Abuse, Elder Guardianship, Guardian Ad Litem, Guardianship, Guardianship Administration, Incompetency Proceedings, Mental Disability Law, Health Care, Litigation, Trusts and Estates, Contested Trusts and Estates, Decedents Estates, Estate Administration, Estate Bankruptcy, Estate Litigation, Estate Planning, Estate Planning for Parents of Handicapped Children, Estate Planning for the Disabled, Estate Planning for the Elderly, Estate Planning for Unmarried Couples, Estate Settlements, Family Trusts, Family Wealth Transfer, Fiduciary Law, Fiduciary Liability, Fiduciary Litigation, Financial Planning, Living Trusts, Personal Planning, Powers of Attorney, Retirement Planning, Special Needs Trusts, Surrogates Court Practice, Trust Administration, Trust and Estate Collections, Trust Law, Trust Litigation, Trust Planning, Unclaimed Property, Wealth Planning, Wealth Preservation, Wills, Contested Wills, Inheritance, Living Wills, Missing Heir Searches, Successions, Family Law, Aged and Aging, Age Discrimination, Elder Abuse, Elder Care, Elder Rights, Probate, Ancillary Probate, Probate Administration, Probate Litigation, Probate Taxation, Medicaid Planning, Medicare and Medicaid, Medicaid Hearings, Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement, Medicare Fraud and Abuse, Medicare Set Aside Arrangements, Social Security, Social Security Appeals, Social Security Disability, Social Security Disability Insurance, Supplemental Security Income, Nursing Home, Special Needs

 

Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates, Elder Law and Criminal Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 6 reviews
  • Recommended by 6 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 06/23/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Of Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in 1991, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, and U.S. Supreme Court

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Rutgers University School of Law
    Class of 1991
    J.D.
    Tax Honors, with distinction

    University Attended

    Boston University
    Class of 1988
    B.S.
    Business Administration

    Birth Information

    Born in 1966
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, January 27, 1966

    Associations & Memberships

    Ocean County Bar Association (Member, Elder Law Subcommittee); New Jersey State Bar Association; American Bar Association.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    732-797-1600 Call Now

    Fax

    732-797-1637

    Email

    Send email to Diana L. Anderson

    Social Networking



    Office Information
    Diana L. Anderson
    Of Counsel
    The Law Center of Ocean County 9 Robbins Street,
    Toms River, NJ 08753-7680

    Maintains an office in multiple locations
    Loading...

    Logo
    Carluccio, Leone, Dimon, Doyle & Sacks, L.L.C. (Toms River, New Jersey)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.