Stanford R. Solomon

Attorney in Tampa, FL
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Creditor Bankruptcy
  • Family Law
  • Civil Trial
  • White Collar Crime
  • Legal Malpractice
  • Real Estate Law
  • Finance
  • Banking Law


Overall Client Rating

in Corporate Law
1.2 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 12/14/14
Posted by a Small Business on 12/14/14
1.3 out of 5.0
Over bills in a methodical way just as other customers have complained on the web. I felt Stanford Solomon can not be trusted. His motives are to over bill and not what is best for the customers. He ends up suing his customers. My experience with other attorneys in the Solomon Law Group in Tampa, is that they are only "puppets" of his and so the "office" is only... Sandy Stanford himself. His billing practices are designed to confuse you. Pretends to know all but he is a divorce attorney. Avoid.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials


Managing Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1980, Florida, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida and U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
1982, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
1985, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida
U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
U.S. Tax Court

Featured Lawyers

Attorneys Group of Tampa Bay
Tampa, U.S.A.
855-610-8744 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating N/A

Adams & Diaco, P.A.
Tampa, U.S.A.
813-666-8461 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.