Mrs. Mary Elizabeth Quinn

Attorney in Tampa, FL
Board Certified Marital & Family Law Attorney with 17 years of experience in the area of family law. Member, Family Law Inns of Court. Seminars Conducted: Overview of Family and Matrimonial Law, 1998—; Divorce Law in Florida, 2003; Marital Agreements in Florida, 2002; Handling your First Custody Dispute, 2001; Child Custody Modifications, 2001; Divorce Taxation in Florida, 1997. Partner, Turmel & Quinn, P.A., Tampa, Florida, 1999-2002. Litigation Associate, Barr, Murman, Tonelli, P.A., Tampa, Florida, 1997-1999.
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Visitation
  • Alimony
  • Child Support
  • Marital Assets and Debts
  • Modification
  • Paternity
  • Domestic Violence
  • Enforcement
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Matrimonial Law
  • Separation


Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
4.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 7 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 12/21/14
Posted by a Consumer on 12/21/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Mary made sure I was taken care of in my divorce. She brought up issues that hadn't occurred to me, explained everything well, and definitely helped me get what I need.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 12/09/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Ms. Quinn handles herself in the most professional manner at all times. Thus is why she is highly respected amongst her peers in the legal community. She diligently works on your case and does not miss deadlines or drag out any court dates. Her vast knowledge of family law provides her clients with the best end result. You owe it to yourself to hire Ms. Quinn to represent you in any family law case.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 09/23/14
1.5 out of 5.0
She is knowledgeable on the basics but she did not understand our divorce case and several things were mismanaged. There is more than will write here but a basic overview: Papers were misfiled with a fellow client and some were lost. Last month, received a financial affidavit from another client of hers (and my divorce was final months ago with no correspondence with Mary since that time). Confidentiality breach while working with her and after our divorce was complete. Failure to provide proper legal guidance that would allow more efficient handling of paperwork and help manage attorney expenditures. Example, had initial court date set for divorce, but already had mediation underway and a follow up mediation shortly after the scheduled court date. Requested we consider cancelling court and Mary Quinn stated the court date could not be cancelled. That same day, received notice of request from opposing counsel to cancel courtdate until after second mediation meeting stating there may not be a no need for court until mediation agreement complete (or if the mediator will no longer be used and both parties wish to proceed directly through the courts). In open discussion on billing, Mary Quinn confirmed there would be no surprises and any time the retainer was close to a zero balance, additional funds would need paid up front as she did wish to work without funds already in hand. That provided great comfort to me in our opening discussions. Actual billing came every two months and with me owing more than double any retainers. After first bill, shared would need to know billing as it was happening and avoid additional surprises. Was informed by Mary Quinn to read the actual contract I signed at beginning of divorce proceedings and, she was correct, it did state billing would be periodic. The discrepancy between verbal vs. written was a big disappointment and did not help when going through a divorce. In email correspondence. Documents shared stated read and share your thoughts. Several were much like a foreign language to me and there would be no thoughts to share. It would have been helpful to receive documents with simple summary stating this is what this really means and here is my recommendation. Shared this on numerous occassions and gave examples of what would help to expedite our communication and stay focused on the divorce. The request was repeatedly refused. It was difficult to write this but felt the importance of sharing as the list is much longer than what shared here. It is not a customer scorned, rather, a prior client that felt it necessary to share with others to proceed with caution and use the above information when seeking attorney assistance - to have more knowledge than I -things are not always what they seem
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 03/27/14
5.0 out of 5.0
What do you say when you cannot say enough about a true professional? Mary Quinn is not a multi function attorney, she is a laser guided law machine. Mary Quinn took my case under unusual circumstances, 1 month from trial, after I had lost confidence in another attorney. She went into what I now call "Mary mode", where you feel like you are her only client. Only hire Mary if you want the best in Tampa and are willing to do what she tells you. Trusted and highly recommended.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 03/17/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Ms. Quinn will help you understand the complete process of divorce and help you make the right decisions for you and your family. My divorce case was a nightmare. I'd lost my ability to compromise with my ex-wife. Mary single-handedly resurrected negotiations with opposing counsel and saved me from a costly court appearance. She focused on my prorities, she was kind, patient, professional, and persistent!! She explained everything to me and treated me like her only client!! She is the VERY BEST!
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 03/17/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Ms Quinn was very attentive to details and always made sure to let me know what the process was about and the steps she was taking and the purpose. Also, she always provided the appropriate advise prior to and during any court proceeding.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 08/11/13
1.5 out of 5.0
Failed to follow through on most points brought up.
Quite expensive; expected an interested attorney who wanted to help clients more than collecting the considerable fees.
Cuts ties with clients and sends out a "final" bill so that the client will not recontact this attorney with complaints on service. Once the client goes away, the "final" bill goes away.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1996, Florida
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida

Law School Attended

St. Thomas University School of Law
Class of 1996
with honors

University Attended

University of South Florida
Class of 1991



Associations & Memberships

The Florida Bar (Member, Family Law Section; Family Law Rules and Forms Committee, 2006-2009, 2009-2012); Hillsborough County Bar Association (Member, Family Law Section); Florida Ass... More


(Board Certified Marital and Family Law Lawyer, Florida Bar Board Of Legal Specialization And Education)

Contact Information


813-223-7739 Call Now




Send email to Mrs. Mary Elizabeth Quinn

Office Information
Mrs. Mary Elizabeth Quinn
 412 East Madison Street, Suite 803,
Tampa, FL 33602-4616


Quinn Law Firm, P.A. (Tampa, Florida)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.