John M. Fitzgibbons

Attorney in Tampa, FL
Phone number not available
View Web Site
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Defense
  • Criminal Trial Law

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1975, Iowa
1976, U.S. Tax Court
1979, U.S. Supreme Court
1983, District of Columbia
1986, Florida
U.S. Courts of Appeal: 1976, Eighth Circuit
1978, Fifth Circuit
1983, District of Columbia Circuit
1983, Eleventh Circuit
1989, Fourth Circuit
U.S. District Courts: 1975, Northern District of Iowa
1976, Southern District of Iowa
1981, Western District of Oklahoma
1983, Eastern District of Kentucky
1986, Middle District of Florida
1988, Southern District of Florida (General Bar), District of Maryland and Southern District of Alabama
1989, Southern District of Florida (Trial Bar)
1992, Northern District of California
1993, District of Columbia
1999, District of Connecticut, Northern District of Illinois (General Bar and Trial Bar). Pro Hac Vice: 1988, Northern District of Florida
1989, Southern District of West Virginia, Western District of North Carolina
1990, Southern District of Mississippi
1997, District of Utah
1999, Middle District of Tennessee
2006, District of South Carolina

Bar Fellowship

American College of Trial Lawyers; American Board of Criminal Lawyers; International Academy of Trial Lawyers.


Featured Lawyers
Loading...


Attorneys Group of Tampa Bay
Tampa, U.S.A.
855-610-8744 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating N/A


Katz & Phillips, P.A.
Tampa, U.S.A.
855-790-8859 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating N/A


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.