Hancock Estabrook, LLP

Law Firm in Syracuse, NY
315-565-4500

Client Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.8 of 5

About This Firm

Hancock Estabrook, which was founded in 1889, has grown steadily. Today, we have more than 65 attorneys with the depth and ability to serve a wide array of client needs. Our founders' original philosophy, however, remains unchanged, to provide quality legal services in a timely and cost-effective manner. Through specialization, we bring expertise to complex legal issues and are able to identify and understand each client's unique circumstances.

Areas of Law

  • Health Care
  • Estate Planning
  • Banking
  • Corporate and Business
  • Municipal
  • Public Authority
  • Industrial Development Financing
  • Tax
  • Probate
  • Condemnation
  • Elder Law.
  • Environmental
  • Real Estate
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Zoning
  • Labor Relations
  • Negligence
  • Product Liability
  • Hospital Malpractice Defense
  • Construction
  • Professional Liability Defense
 
Rating Not Shown
This firm has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by its clients.

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Stewart F. Hancock
Stewart F. Hancock
Member
(1883-1966)
Theodore M. Hancock
Theodore M. Hancock
Member
(1913-1988)
Charles S. Estabrook
Charles S. Estabrook
Member
(1879-1975)
A. Van W. Hancock
A. Van W. Hancock
Member
(1909-1993)
Of Counsel
Of Counsel
Of Counsel
Partner
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate

Firm Details

Year Established

1889

Firm Size

69

Clients

HEALTH CARE: Crouse Hospital, St. Joseph's Hospital, Central New York Hospital Association, Rome Memorial Hospital, Community Memorial Hospital, Oneida Health Care Center, Syracuse Community Health Center, Lewis County Hospital, VHA Empire State, Lee Memorial Hospital (Fulton), Oswego Hospital, Crouse Community Center Nursing Home, Hospital Home Health Care (Fulton), East Hill Family Medical, Summit Medical (Auburn), Good Shepherd —, Fairview Home (Binghamton) and Loretto.

Clients

BANKING: M&T Bank, HSBC Bank USA, Citizens Bank and Partners Trust Bank.

Clients

MANUFACTURING & INDUSTRIAL: Kinney Drugs Inc., ParTech, Crucible Materials Corp, Mobil Oil Corp, Volvo Cars of North America, Production Products Company, G.A. Braun, Burrows Paper Corp, Amerada Hess Corp, Monarch Machine Tool Co., Ryder Transportation Services, Inc., Cooper Industries, Inc., ConMed Corp, New Venture Gear, Strathmore Products, Inc., Pass & Seymour, Inc., Carrier Corp., Buckeye Pipeline, Ford Motor Co., DaimlerChrysler, Suburban Propane, Aldis, Family Dollar and Liftech.

Clients

MUNICIPAL AND EDUCATION: County of Onondaga, County of Oneida, County of Madison, County of Yates, County of Otsego, County of Chenango, Town of Marcy, Metropolitan Development Association, Mohawk Valley Water Authority, Massena Electric Department, Onondaga Hill Fire Department, Plainville Fire District, City of Sherrill, Village of Fayetteville, Village of Penn Yan, Village of Owego, Village of Camillus, Town of Manlius, LeMoyne College, Schalmont Central School District, Mohawk Valley Community College, Genesee Community College: Phoenix Central School District, Dryden Central School District and Vernon-Verona-Sherrill Central School District.

Clients

INSURANCE COMPANIES: St. Paul Travelers, Amica Insurance Co., Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co., Acadia Insurance Co., Zurich America, North Country Insurance Co., Countryway Insurance Co. and Providence Washington Insurance Co.

Community Contributions

Contact Information

Firm Address

Hancock Estabrook, LLP
1500 AXA Tower 1 100 Madison Street,
Syracuse, NY 13202
U.S.A.

Phone

315-565-4500

Fax

315-565-4600

Email

Send email to Hancock Estabrook, LLP

Office Information
1500 AXA Tower 1 100 Madison Street,
Syracuse, NY 13202

Loading...



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.