James L. Gascoyne

Attorney in Sugar Land, TX
Phi Alpha Delta (Treasurer, 1976). Member, Order of the Barons. Recipient, American Jurisprudence Awards. Gascoyne & Associates, 1999-2002; Collins & Gascoyne, L.L.P., 1998-1999; The Law Offices of James L. Gascoyne, 1995-1998; Weitinger, Steelhammer & Tucker, 1978-1989; Tucker, Hendryx & Gascoyne, 1989-1995.
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Products Liability
  • Premises Liability
  • Defense Litigation
  • Construction Liability
  • Intentional Torts
  • Insurance Litigation
  • Insurance Defense
  • Negligence


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1978, Texas
1979, U.S. District Court, Southern and Eastern Districts of Texas
1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
1986, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Houston School of Law
    Class of 1978
    cum laude

    University Attended

    University of Texas at El Paso
    Class of 1975
    Criminal Justice

    Birth Information

    Born in 1950
    El Paso, Texas, November 12, 1950

    Associations & Memberships

    Houston, Fort Bend and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Texas; American Board of Trial Advocates; Texas Association of Defense Counsel.

    Contact Information




    Send email to James L. Gascoyne

    Office Information
    James L. Gascoyne
     77 Sugar Creek Center Boulevard, Suite 280,
    Sugar Land, TX 77478


    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.