Rebecca S. Colaw

Attorney in Suffolk, VA
Recipient: United States Power Squadrons, W. Norman Frank, Jr. Lifesaving Award; Naval Legal Service Office Mid-At Community Partnership Award.
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • DUI
  • Personal Injury
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Juvenile and Children's Law
  • Traffic Offenses
  • Felonies
  • Misdemeanors
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Visitation Rights
  • Appeals, State and Federal
  • Estate Planning
  • Wills and Trusts
  • Servicemen's Civil Relief Act
  • Military Law
  • Commercial Collections


Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2002, Virginia
2002, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Law School Attended

Regent University
Class of 2001

University Attended

University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Class of 1982

Golden Gate University
Class of 1986
Criminal Justice


Retired U.S. Air Force Officer, 1984-2004; Persian Gulf War Veteran

Associations & Memberships

Virginia State Bar; Suffolk Bar Association.

Representative Cases

Gordon v. Pete's Auto Serv. of Denbigh, 637 F.3d 454, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2816 (4th Cir. Va. 2011); Gordon v. Pete's Auto Serv. of Denbigh, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32262 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2012).

Contact Information


757-539-5743 Call Now




Send email to Rebecca S. Colaw

Social Networking

Office Information
Rebecca S. Colaw
 2470 Pruden Boulevard,
Suffolk, VA 23434


Rebecca S. Colaw, P.C. (Suffolk, Virginia)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.