Joseph W. Flynn

Attorney in Suffield, CT
Phi Delta Phi; Pi Sigma Alpha. Board of Directors, Connecticut Attorneys Title Insurance Co. Advisory Board Member, Rockville Bank. Member, Editorial Board, St. Louis University Law Journal, 1979-1980; President, Student Bar Association, 1979-1980. Member: Windsor Locks Board of Education, 1981-1985; Windsor Locks Board of Finance, 1987-2001, Chairman, 1990-1996.

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Probate
  • Estate Administration
  • Estate Planning
  • Wills
  • Criminal Law
  • Zoning Law


Overall Client Rating

in Real Estate and Trusts and Estates
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 04/05/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1981, Connecticut

Law School Attended

St. Louis University
Class of 1980

University Attended

University of Connecticut
Class of 1977
cum laude

Hartford Seminary
Class of 2007
Theology and Ethics

Birth Information

Born in 1955
Hartford, Connecticut, June 4, 1955

Associations & Memberships

Hartford County, Connecticut and American Bar Associations; Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association.

Contact Information




Send email to Joseph W. Flynn

Office Information
Joseph W. Flynn
 53 Mountain Road,
Suffield, CT 06078


Alfano & Flynn, LLC (Suffield, Connecticut)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.