Joseph M. Pankowski, Jr.

Attorney in Stamford, CT
Justice of the Peace, Darien, Connecticut, 1996—. Chair, Darien Commission on Aging, 2008—.
Free Consultation

Areas of Law

Estate PlanningEstate SettlementTrust AdministrationCharitable GivingGuardianship and Conservatorship
Estate Planning
Estate Settlement
Trust Administration
Charitable Giving
Guardianship and Conservatorship


Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 10/31/13
Posted by a Consumer on 10/31/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Joe is a wonderful lawyer. He is both brilliant and personable, and he gets the job done! He displays a delightful combination of intellectual acumen and the refreshing energy of a blithe spirit. I recommend Joe wholeheartedly and unconditionally to anyone and everyone.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1990, Connecticut
1991, New York

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Virginia School of Law
    Class of 1990

    New York University School of Law
    Class of 1996
    LL.M. in Taxation

    University Attended

    Florida State University
    Class of 1986
    summa cum laude

    Yale University
    Class of 1996
    M.A. in Religion

    Birth Information

    Born in 1964
    Gainesville, Florida, March 14, 1964

    Associations & Memberships

    Stamford/Norwalk and Connecticut Bar Associations.

    Contact Information


    203-327-2300 Call Now




    Send email to Joseph M. Pankowski, Jr.

    Office Information
    Joseph M. Pankowski, Jr.
     600 Summer Street,
    Stamford, CT 06901-1490


    Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky, LLP (Stamford, Connecticut)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.