Beltz & Ruth, P.A.

Law Firm in St. Paul, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
  • Personal Injury
  • Accidents
  • Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Mesothelioma
  • Bicycle Products Liability
  • Drug and Medical Device Litigation
  • Drug Contamination
  • Elevator Liability
  • Manufacturers Liability
  • Product Failure
  • Product Recall
  • Tire Defect Litigation
  • Admiralty and Maritime Law
  • Admiralty Law
  • Maritime Accidents
  • Maritime Personal Injury
  • Aged and Aging
  • Elder Abuse
  • Elder Care
  • Airbag Injury
  • Avandia
  • Benzene Exposure
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Civil Practice
  • Complex and Multi-District Litigation
  • Crestor
  • Cruise Ship Injuries
  • Defective Defibrillators
  • Defective Hip Implants
  • Duragesic Patch
  • E Coli Contamination
  • Enbrel
  • Ephedra
  • Erbs Palsy
  • Fentanyl
  • Fosamax
  • Helicopter Crash Litigation
  • Ketek
  • Kidney Failure
  • Lung Cancer
  • Birth Trauma
  • Chiropractors Malpractice
  • Cosmetic Surgery Malpractice
  • Dental Malpractice
  • Failure to Diagnose
  • Gynecology Malpractice
  • Medical Negligence
  • Medication Errors
  • Mental Health Professionals Malpractice
  • Medical Liability
  • Nursing Malpractice
  • Nursing Negligence
  • Obstetric Malpractice
  • Optometric Malpractice
  • Orthopedic Malpractice
  • Pediatric Malpractice
  • Pharmacists Liability
  • Physicians Professional Liability
  • Podiatric Malpractice
  • Psychiatric Malpractice
  • Psychology Malpractice
  • Surgeons Liability
  • Wrong Site Surgery
  • Nursing Liability
  • Meridia
  • Negligence
  • Neurontin
  • Ortho Evra
  • Paxil
  • Plavix
  • Animal Attacks
  • Aquatic Injuries
  • Automobile Negligence
  • Bicycle Accidents
  • Boating Accidents
  • Bodily Injury
  • Brain Injury
  • Bus Accidents
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • Catastrophic Injury
  • Commercial Vehicle Liability
  • Cumulative Trauma
  • Dog Bites
  • Electrical Injury
  • Head Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents and Injuries
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Pedestrian Injuries
  • Personal Injury Appeals
  • Personal Injury Arbitration
  • Personal Injury Mediation
  • Plaintiffs Personal Injury
  • Power Line Contact Injury
  • Psychological Injury
  • Rental Vehicle Litigation
  • Repetitive Stress Injury
  • School Bus Accidents
  • Severe Burns
  • Sexual Abuse
  • Slip and Fall
  • Spinal Injury
  • Subway Accidents
  • Third Party Wrongful Death
  • TMJ Dysfunction
  • Tourist Injuries
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Unintended Acceleration
  • Whiplash
  • Wrongful Death
  • Products Liability
  • All Terrain Vehicle Products Liability
  • Automotive Crashworthiness
  • Automotive Design Liability
  • Automotive Products Liability
  • Automotive Restraints
  • Biomedical Products Liability
  • Blood Bank Liability
  • Chemical Products Liability
  • Chemical Explosions
  • Engineering Products Liability
  • Environmental Products Liability
  • Escalator Liability
  • Explosions
  • Firearms Litigation
  • Flammable Fabrics
  • Food Borne Disease
  • Food Products Liability
  • Gas Explosions
  • Heart Device Litigation
  • Heavy Equipment Products Liability
  • Industrial Products Liability
  • Lemon Law
  • Motorcycle Products Liability
  • Product Defects
  • Product Safety
  • Product Warning Labels
  • Products Liability Arbitration
  • Products Liability Mediation
  • Propane Products Liability
  • Recreational Products Liability
  • Recreational Vehicle Products Liability
  • Seat Belt Injury
  • Tire/Rim Mismatch
  • Tobacco Litigation
  • Vaccine Injury
  • Vehicle Rollovers
  • Welding Products Liability
  • Design Professionals Liability
  • Professional Malpractice
  • Professional Negligence
  • Professional Liability
  • Propulsid Litigation
  • Railroad Accidents and Injuries
  • Railroad Crossing Accidents
  • Railroad Liability
  • Train Derailments
  • Railroad Safety
  • Railroad Litigation
  • FELA Occupational Hearing Loss
  • Railroad Law
  • Amusement Park Liability
  • Hotel Liability
  • Marina Liability
  • Recreational Property Law
  • Ski Area Liability
  • Water Park Safety
  • Restaurant Liability
  • Resorts and Leisure
  • Rezulin
  • Seatbelt Injury
  • Serzone
  • Sports Injury
  • Sports Law
  • Tainted Tissue Transplant Litigation
  • Civil Liability
  • Intentional Torts
  • Mass Torts
  • Tort Liability
  • Torts
  • Asbestos Litigation
  • Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
  • Chemical Exposure
  • Lead Poisoning
  • Occupational Cancer
  • Occupational Disease
  • Pesticide Litigation
  • Radiation Injury
  • Toxic Exposure
  • Toxic Tort Class Actions
  • Toxic Torts
  • Highway Design Liability
  • Motor Carrier Liability
  • Truck Accidents
  • Trucking Liability
  • Trucking Law
  • Transportation
  • Trasylol
  • Viagra
  • Vinyl Chloride Exposure
  • Zicam
  • Zyprexa
  • Accutane Litigation
  • Darvon/Darvocet
  • Defective Knee Replacements.
 

Overall Client Rating

in Personal Injury, Business Law and Litigation
3.9 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.9
Responsiveness
3.9
Quality of Service
3.9
Value for Money
3.9

  • Data based on 14 reviews
  • Recommended by 11 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 10/30/13
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Managing Attorney
Related Law Firms
Loading...

Edina, Minnesota
952-896-1099 | Email
Client Rating N/A

Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

St. Paul, Minnesota
651-222-9991 | Email
Client Rating N/A

Peer Rating

4.9 / 5.0



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.