Thomas J. Magee

Attorney in St. Louis, MO
Recognized By:Super Lawyers

Practice Description:
Mr. Magee focuses his practice on trials involving complex litigation matters, including:

•Products liability
•Professional liability
•Commercial litigation
•General personal injury
•Trucking
•Automobile

Awards, Honors Distinctions
TheBest Lawyers in America since 2007
Best Lawyers in St. Louis by St. Louis Magazine since 2007
He has been named top 50Missouri Kansas SuperLawyers in St. Louis and top 100Missouri Kansas SuperLawyers since 2008
AV Preeminent attorneys by Martindale-Hubbell
Missouri Super Lawyer since 2006
Recipient of the Missouri Lawyers Weekly 2014 Missouri Lawyer Award for the most reported verdicts/judgments as a defense attorney

314-480-4212
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Products Liability
  • Insurance Coverages
  • Automobile
  • Professional Malpractice

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1985, Missouri
1986, Illinois
1985, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
1987, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
1989, U.S. Supreme Court
1990, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois
1991, U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri
2003, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Law School Attended

St. Louis University School of Law
Class of 1985
J.D.
cum laude

University Attended

Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI
Class of 1982
B.S.

Birth Information

Born in 1960
St. Louis, Missouri, December 19, 1960

Associations & Memberships

Bar/Professional Association Involvement<

Bar Fellowship

of the American College of Trial Lawyers
Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis
The Missouri Bar
Illinois State Bar Association
Missouri Organization of Defense Lawyers
Association of Ski Defense Attorneys

Representative Cases

Reported Cases; Bucksaw Resort, LLC v. Mehrtens, 414 S.W. 3 rd 39 (Mo. App. 2013); Guthrie v. Hidden Valley Golf and Ski, Inc., 407 S. W. 3 rd 642 (Mo. App. 2013); Schneider v. Snow Creek, Inc, WD No. 71134 (Mo App 2011); First Student, Inc. v. Coleman, 324 S.W. 2d 776 (Mo App 2010); Adams v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, 317 S.W. 2d 66 (Mo. App... More

Contact Information

Phone

314-480-4212

Email

Send email to Thomas J. Magee


Office Information
Thomas J. Magee
Partner
 211 North Broadway, Suite 2700,
St. Louis, MO 63102

Loading...

Logo
HeplerBroom LLC (St. Louis, Missouri)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.