S. Lee Patton LinkedIn

Attorney in St. Louis, MO
Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College Ranch Club. National Child Abuse Defense Resource Center - 30 years trial experience.
314-717-0903
Personal Injury
Personal Injury
100%
Other Areas of Law
Slip and Fall, Motorcycle Collisions, Big Truck Collisions

 

Overall Client Rating

in Personal Injury, Family Law and Debtor and Creditor
4.1 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.3
Responsiveness
4.0
Quality of Service
4.0
Value for Money
4.0

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 05/28/13
Posted by a Consumer on 05/28/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I have used Mr Patton for years in several different situations for
myself and my mother. Mr Patton made every situation less stressful
and quickly resolved matters with excellent communication.
You will not be lost in a big firm and not be charged a crazy amount
to have the matter resolved.
I am very glad to know when legal advice or action is needed to have
Mr Patton on my side!!!
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 09/14/12
2.3 out of 5.0
He did not act like a lawyer. He did not offer many suggestions pertaining to my lawsuit. Slow in returning phone calls.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Trial lawyer

Admission Details

Admitted in 1982, Missouri
1983, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri

Law School Attended

Saint Louis University School of Law
Class of 1982
J.D.

University Attended

Saint Louis University School of Business
Class of 1979
B.S.B.A.
magna cum laude

Associations & Memberships

The Missouri Bar; Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys, 1985

Contact Information

Phone

314-965-2888 Call Now

Mobile

314-277-4535

Email

Send email to S. Lee Patton


Office Information
S. Lee Patton
Trial lawyer
 11413 Manchester Road,
St. Louis, MO 63122

Loading...


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.