Noel A. Sevastianos

Attorney in St. Louis, MO
Author, "Recovery of Economic Damages Against Environmental Professionals- Another Exception Carved from the Economic Loss Rule," Real Estate Environmental Liability News, February 28, 1994.
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
  • Brain Injury
  • Head Injury
  • Estate Planning
  • Business Litigation
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Slip and Fall
  • Spinal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Wrongful Death


Overall Client Rating

in Business Law and Workers Compensation
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 03/01/13
Posted by a Small Business on 03/01/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Easy to work with and very capable.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1990, Illinois
1994, Missouri

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Washington University
    Class of 1990

    University Attended

    St. Louis University
    Class of 1985

    Birth Information

    Born in 1962
    St. Louis, Missouri, October 30, 1962

    Associations & Memberships

    Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis; Illinois State Bar Association; The Missouri Bar; Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys; Association of Trial Lawyers of America.

    Contact Information




    Send email to Noel A. Sevastianos

    Office Information
    Noel A. Sevastianos
     120 South Central Avenue, Suite 130,
    St. Louis, MO 63105-1705


    Sevastianos & Associates (St. Louis, Missouri)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.