Fox, Goldblatt & Singer, P.C.

Law Firm in St. Louis, MO
Over $300 million collected for victims of car accidents, truck accidents, and explosions.
314-732-4278

About This Firm

Established in 1949, the firm of Fox, Goldblatt & Singer, P.C. has earned an exceptional reputation in St. Louis, Missouri and throughout the Midwest for its team of trusted personal injury lawyers committed to upholding the rights of the seriously injured. Our St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyers, who also serve individuals in Illinois and throughout the Midwest, have represented clients in an extensive range of claims, including those involving auto accidents, truck accidents, burn injuries, and wrongful death. In doing so, we have consistently demonstrated our dedication to helping clients obtain appropriate compensation for their injuries.

In our firm's history, our personal injury lawyers have amassed an impressive record of success, having recovered more than 300 million US Dollar in jury awards and settlements on behalf of their clients.

If you or a family member has been a victim of a serious injury, you do not need to suffer in silence. Contact our Missouri personal injury lawyers to arrange a free consultation. Whether you are in Chicago, St. Louis, or elsewhere in the Midwest, at Fox, Goldblatt & Singer, P.C., you will find the commitment you need to get the results you deserve.

The Firm has achieved the highest rating for legal ability in Martindale-Hubbell.

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Trucking and Motorcycle Accidents
  • Products Liability
  • Wrongful Death
  • Premises Liability
  • Workers Compensation
  • Slip and Fall
  • Dog Bites
  • Construction Injuries
  • Head and Spinal Injuries
  • Whiplash
  • Airbag Injury
  • Seatbelt Injury
  • Railroad Accidents and Defective Products
  • Admiralty and Maritime Law
  • Airplane Crash Litigation
  • Asbestos
  • Birth Injuries
  • Drug and Medical Device Litigation
  • Mold Litigation
  • Nursing Home Litigation
  • Baycol
  • Benzene
  • Bextra
  • Celebrex
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Crestor
  • Dental Malpractice.
  • Breast Implant Litigation
  • Fen-Phen
  • Fosamax
  • Helicopter Crash
  • Liposuction
  • Mesothelioma
  • Ortho Evra
  • PPH Litigation
  • Paxil
  • Rezulin
  • Serzone
  • Viagra
  • Vioxx
  • Zicam
  • Zoloft
  • Zyprexa
  • Erbs Palsy
  • Ephedra
  • E-Coli Contamination
  • Defective Hip Implants
  • Defective Defibrillators
  • Cruise Ship Injuries
  • Toxic Torts
  • Legal Malpractice
  • Libel
  • Slander and Defamation
  • Labor and Employment
  • Consumer Fraud
  • Class Actions
 

Overall Client Rating

in Personal Injury, Workers Compensation and Social Security
3.5 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.6
Responsiveness
3.2
Quality of Service
3.5
Value for Money
3.6

  • Data based on 8 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 01/27/14
Posted by a Consumer on 01/27/14
1.0 out of 5.0
No Communication. Never returns phones calls and Doens't care about his cilents.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 10/05/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Great Staff
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

Firm Details

Year Established

1949

Firm Size

6

Reference

Mercantile Trust Co.

Contact Information

Firm Address

Fox, Goldblatt & Singer, P.C.
Laclede Gas Building 720 Olive Street, Suite 1901,
St. Louis, MO 63101
U.S.A.

Phone 1

314-732-4278 Call firm now

Phone 2

314-231-4100

Email

Send email to Fox, Goldblatt & Singer, P.C.

Office Information
Laclede Gas Building 720 Olive Street, Suite 1901,
St. Louis, MO 63101

Loading...

Office Hours
Saturday
By appointment
Sunday
By appointment


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.