Daniel J. O'Connell

Attorney in Springfield, MA
Attorney Daniel J. O'Connell is the managing partner of O'Connell & Plumb, P.C. He graduated cum laude with his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and graduated with his Juris Doctorate from Boston University Law School in 1987.

Attorney O'Connell is admitted to practice in Massachusetts, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. He is a member of the Hampden County Bar Association, Massachusetts Bar Associations and Association of Trial Lawyers of America.

He has published articles in professional journals on Bank lender liability, Employment law and Labor law. He has further lectured on trial practice for continuing legal education courses in Massachusetts. Attorney O'Connell served previously as a member of the litigation department for the Boston Law Firm of Riemer & Braunstein and the Springfield Firm of Bacon & Wilson, P.C. Attorney O'Connell has extensive trial experience and has obtained many favorable verdicts and settlements on his client's behalf. For example, in a recent employment discrimination case, he obtained a 1.4 million dollar jury verdict for his client.

Attorney O'Connell practices in a myriad of areas, including: trial practice, complex civil litigation, criminal litigation and defense, employment discrimination and sexual harassment, business and corporate litigation, real estate and general trial practice.
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Trial Practice
  • Complex Civil Litigation
  • Criminal Litigation and Defense
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Business and Corporate Litigation
  • Real Estate
  • General Trial Practice
  • Labor and Employment
  • Age Discrimination in Employment
  • Americans With Disabilities Act
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Confidentiality Agreements
  • Covenants Not To Compete
  • Employee Discipline
  • Employee Rights
  • Employment Arbitration
  • Employment Civil Rights
  • Employment Claims
  • Employment Class Actions
  • Employment Contracts
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Employment Defense
  • Employment Disability Discrimination
  • Employment Law
  • Employment Litigation
  • Employment Mediation
  • Employment Rights
  • Employment Terminiation
  • Employment at Will
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Law
  • Fair Employment Practices
  • Family and Medical Leave Act
  • Federal Employment Law
  • Harassment
  • Management Employment Law
  • Noncompete Litigation
  • Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Agreements
  • Personnel Policies
  • Pregnancy Discrimination
  • Retaliatory Discharge
  • Title VII Discrimination
  • Wage and Hour Class Actions


Overall Client Rating

in Labor and Employment and Criminal Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 09/26/13
Posted by a Consumer on 09/26/13
5.0 out of 5.0
very attentive and understanding.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 04/06/13
5.0 out of 5.0
A true professional. He was wonderful,and helped my son out of a serious criminal issue.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1987, Massachusetts
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
United States Supreme Court

Credit Cards Accepted
Law School Attended

Boston University Law School
Class of 1987

University Attended

University of Massachusetts
Class of 1984
cum laude

Contact Information


(413) 733-9111 Call Now


Send email to Daniel J. O

Office Information
Daniel J. O'Connell
 75 Market Place,
Springfield, MA 01103


O'Connell & Plumb, P.C. (Springfield, Massachusetts)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.