Joshua T. Thompson

Attorney in Spartanburg, SC
Phi Beta Kappa; Phi Delta Phi; Order of Wig and Robe; The Order of the Coif. Associate Managing Editor, South Carolina Law Review (2009-2010). Editor, South Carolina Law Review (2008-2009).
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Litigation
  • Civil Litigation
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Personal Injury
  • Products Liability
  • Torts
  • Insurance Defense
  • Law Enforcement


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2010, South Carolina
2011, United States District Court, District of South Carolina
2013, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of South Carolina School of Law
    Class of 2010
    magna cum laude

    University Attended

    Wofford College
    Class of 2007
    magna cum laude

    Birth Information

    Born in 1985
    Union, South Carolina, 1985

    Associations & Memberships

    South Carolina Bar; Spartanburg County Bar; Seventh Circuit Young Lawyers Division of South Carolina Bar Association.

    Contact Information






    Send email to Joshua T. Thompson

    Social Networking

    Office Information
    Joshua T. Thompson
     100 Dunbar Street, Suite 200, 29306, P.O. Drawer 1897,
    Spartanburg, SC 29304-1897


    Holcombe Bomar, P.A. (Spartanburg, South Carolina)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.