Andrew J. Johnston

Attorney in Spartanburg, SC
Phone number not available
View Web Site
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.8 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Murder
  • Manslaughter
  • Attempted Murder
  • Kidnapping
  • Assault and Battery
  • Criminal Domestic Violence
  • Criminal Sexual Conduct
  • Indecent Exposure
  • Obscenity & Criminal Solicitation of a Minor
  • Burglary
  • Larceny
  • Arson
  • Shoplifting
  • Car Breaking
  • Bank Fraud
  • Breach of Trust and Forgery
  • Trafficking
  • Possession and Possession with Intent and Distribution of Marijuana
  • Cocaine
  • Slip and Fall
  • Cocaine Base - Crack
  • Methamphetamine
  • Narcotics and Prescription Medications
  • DUI
  • DUAC
  • DUS
  • Traffic Violations
  • Fail to Stop for Blue Light
  • Violation of the Pistol Act and Possession of Weapons in Commission of a Violent Crime
  • Conspiracy
  • Possession of Firearm by Felon
  • Mail and Wire Fraud
  • Money Laundering
  • Counterfeiting and Bank Robbery
  • Personal Injury
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Trucking Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Drug and Medical Devices
  • Premise Liability


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Criminal Law and General Practice
4.8 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 08/11/13
1.0 out of 5.0
I have referred a number of potential clients to Mr. Johnston as I the utmost respect for his ability in Criminal defense.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 08/05/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I have been an adversary, a colleague and a client of Mr. Johnston and I can honestly say I have never met a more competent attorney. He displays all of the professional courtesy and diligence one would desire in our profession. I realize a perfect score may appear insincere, but I assure you it is not so. I know of no one I trust more than Mr. Johnston.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 08/04/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Andrew is well known statewide as a top notch criminal defense lawyer. I have the utmost respect for him and would recommend him to anyone.
Report abuse
Posted by a Govt. Counsel on 07/31/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I have known Andrew Johnston for nearly my entire sixteen year legal career. He is a fierce advocate for his clients and a role model for fellow lawyers.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 07/28/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I came to know Andy when I was a prosecutor. He was a formidable opponent and I learned tremendously from him.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 07/26/13
5.0 out of 5.0
He is one of the best criminal defense lawyers I have dealt with in my 35+ years of practice.
Report abuse
Posted by a Judge on 07/26/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Great lawyer. Would be secure if he were to represent me.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 07/26/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr. Johnston is a highly regarded criminal defense attorney. He has been a CLE participant. He is bright, prepared, and compassionate. He is certainly deserving of your highest rating.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 07/26/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1985, South Carolina
1986, U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina
1995, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court

Featured Lawyers

Leon L. Campbell
Spartanburg, U.S.A.
864-435-9691 | Email
Client Rating

4.1 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

Harrison, White, Smith & Coggins, P.C.
Spartanburg, U.S.A.
864-435-9688 | Email
Client Rating

3.8 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.