Branch W. Vincent, III

Attorney in Southern Shores, NC
Super Lawyers Class of 2010, 2011, 2012; Top 100 Trial Lawyers North Carolina, The American Trial Lawyers Association, 2010, 2011, 2012; Coach/Manager, OBX Baseball Club; Board Member, Community Care Clinic of Dare; Coach/Manager, OBX Storm Soccer; Sponsor, Outer Banks Daredevils Baseball Team; Sponsor, OBX Youth Soccer Team; Sponsor, OBX Babe Ruth Baseball Team; Sponsor, Dare County Babe Ruth Baseball Team; Coach, OBX Youth Soccer Team; Assistant Coach, First Flight Middle School Soccer Team; Gateway Bank & Trust Advisory Board of Directors for Dare and Currituck County; Director, Outer Banks Babe Ruth Baseball, Inc. President, Outer Banks Babe Ruth Baseball, Inc. Chairman, Board of Trustees, Elizabeth City District, United Methodist Church; Trustee, United Methodist Church, North Carolina Annual Conference; Coach, Babe Ruth Baseball and OBX Riptides AAU Baseball; Coach, Dare County Parks and Recreation, Basketball and Soccer; Drummer, Praise Band, "Nameless," Duck United Methodist Church; Relay for Life Team Captain, "Quacking for a Cure," Duck United Methodist Church; Chairman, Administrative Council, Duck United Methodist Church; Youth Coordinator, Duck United Methodist Church; President, Elizabeth City Kiwanis Club; Instructor, Banking and Law, College of the Albemarle; Director, Boys and Girls Club. Director, SKILLS, Inc.
Free Consultation

Areas of Law

  • Workers Compensation
  • Social Security Disability
  • Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation
  • Federal Workers Compensation
  • Workers Compensation Appeals
  • Premises Liability
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents and Injuries
  • Slip and Fall


Overall Client Rating

in Personal Injury, Employee Benefits and Health Care
4.1 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 11/14/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1986, North Carolina
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Campbell University
    Class of 1986

    University Attended

    Hampden-Sydney College
    Class of 1983

    Birth Information

    Born in 1961
    Richmond, Virginia, April 23, 1961

    Associations & Memberships

    The National Workers Compensation Trial Lawyers Association; North Carolina State Bar; North Carolina Advocates for Justice; The National Trial Lawyers Association; National Organization... More

    Representative Cases

    Saunders v. Edenton OB/GYN Center, 530 SE2d 62 (NC Supreme Court 2000); Glynn v. Pepcom Industries, 469 SE2d 588 (NC Court of Appeals 1996); Vivian M. Berscak, Plaintiff, v. United States Postal Service, 1998 WL 35259569 (1998); Sonya Constance Dowdy, Plaintiff, v. George J. Mcclease, Jr. and State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Co... More

    Hobbies & Interests

    Coaching Baseball and Soccer; Playing Golf;

    Contact Information








    Send email to Branch W. Vincent, III

    Social Networking

    Office Information
    Branch W. Vincent, III
    Southern Shores Business Center 8 Juniper Trail,
    Southern Shores, NC 27949


    The Vincent Law Firm, P.C. (Southern Shores, North Carolina)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.