Pansky Markle Ham LLP

Law Firm in South Pasadena, CA
Advisors to the Legal Community

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

About This Firm

The firm defends attorneys in State Bar disciplinary proceedings, and provides advice on attorney admissions and reinstatement proceedings. It provides representation and advice in actions for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, conflicts of interest, and in attorney partnership and fee disputes, on motions to disqualify and in other matters involving legal ethics, law firm formation and dissolution, and lawyer acquisitions and departures. The firm also represents clients in commercial litigation. Firm lawyers provide expert testimony on legal ethics and standard of care. The firm is a MCLE programming provider in California.

Areas of Law

  • State Bar Disciplinary Defense
  • Attorney Admissions
  • Reinstatement Advice
  • Advice In Actions For Legal Malpractice
  • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
  • Conflicts Of Interest
  • Conflict Waivers
  • Attorney Partnership
  • Fee Disputes
  • MCLE Programming Provider.
  • Motions To Disqualify
  • Other Legal Ethics Issues
  • Law Firm Formation
  • Dissolution
  • Lawyer Acquisitions
  • Departures
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Expert Testimony On Legal Ethics
  • Standard Of Care

Peer Rating


Average Peer Rating

Based on this firm's rated lawyers
5.0 out of 5.0
  • Lawyers rated at this firm meet very high criteria of general ethical standards
5.0 out of 5.0
5.0 out of 5.0

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
R. Gerald Markle
R. Gerald Markle

Firm Details

Firm Size


Contact Information

Firm Address

Pansky Markle Ham LLP
1010 Sycamore Avenue, Suite 308,
South Pasadena, CA 91030-6135


213-626-7300 Call firm now



Office Information
 1010 Sycamore Avenue, Suite 308,
South Pasadena, CA 91030-6135


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.