Mark P. Gross

Attorney in Sherman Oaks, CA
Alpha Lambda Delta; Omicron Delta Kappa. Law Secretary, Hon. Alexander D. Lehrer, Superior Court Matrimonial, Monmouth Court, 1985-1986. Mediator and Judge Pro Tem, Los Angeles County and Ventura County, Superior Courts, 1989—. Charter Member, San Fernando Valley Chapter Inns of Court, 1987. Member, Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce, 1991-1992. Advisory Board, Los Angeles County Divorce Magazine, 1999—. Member, Family Law Symposium Committee, Los Angeles County Bar Association, 2002. Selected, Southern California Super Lawyers in Family Law, 2005-2007.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

Family Law
Family Law


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1985, New Jersey
1986, California

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Law School Attended

University of Florida
Class of 1985

University Attended

University of Florida
Class of 1982

Birth Information

Born in 1960
Brooklyn, New York, December 4, 1960

Associations & Memberships

American, Beverly Hills, Los Angeles County, Monmouth County, San Fernando Valley (Chairman, Mediation Program, 1991-1993; Family Law Executive Committee, 1995—), Bar Associations; State Ba... More

Contact Information



Office Information
Mark P. Gross
 15260 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1500,
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403-5348


Brot & Gross, LLP (Sherman Oaks, California)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.