Robert M. Johnson

Attorney in Sarasota, FL
Phi Alpha Delta (President, 1963-1964). Recipient: Distinguished Alumnus Award, University of Florida, 1992; E.T. York Medal for Service to the State University System; Westcott Medal for Lifetime of Service, Florida State University, 1995. Member, Florida House of Representatives, 1970-1976, 1982-1984. Member, Florida Senate, 1984-1992. Member, Governor's Committee on: Capital Punishment, 1971; Property Rights, 1971; Education, 1972-1974. Member, 1980-1987 and Chairman, 1985-1987, Florida Arts Council. Member, National Council For the Arts, 1987-1994. Director, New College Foundation, Inc., 1979—. Trustee, John and Mabel Ringling Museum of Art, 2000. Member, Florida Historical Preservation Council, 1997-2001. Chairman, New College of Florida, 2001-2007. Trustee, Florida State University Foundation, 1998—.
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Estate Planning
  • Taxation
  • Real Property
  • Probate


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1965, Florida

Law School Attended

University of Florida
Class of 1964

University Attended

Florida State University
Class of 1958

Duke University

Birth Information

Born in 1934
Akron, Ohio, September 1, 1934


Capt., USAF, 1958-1961

Associations & Memberships

Sarasota County Bar Association; The Florida Bar.

Contact Information




Send email to Robert M. Johnson

Office Information
Robert M. Johnson
 1 North Tuttle Avenue,
Sarasota, FL 34237


Johnson, Browning & Clayton (Sarasota, Florida)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.