Mark K. Adams

Attorney in Santa Fe, NM
Professional Experience

Mr. Adams is a director in the Santa Fe office. He practices in the Business Department in the areas of natural resources, water and corporate law and heads the firm's Environment, Natural Resources, Water and Utilities practice group.

• Co-author of New Mexico Environmental Law Handbook
• Unitization of Solid Mineral Properties, 28 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute 733 (1982).
• Minimum Work Clauses in Mining Leases, 21 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute 535 (1976).

(505) 954-3903
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law and Government Relations
  • Banking
  • Financing
  • and Commercial Lending
  • Business Formation and Transactions
  • Environment and Natural Resources
  • Real EstateTransactions
  • Land Use and Real Estate Development
  • Renewable Energy
  • University and Education
  • Utilities
  • Water Law


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1966, New Mexico

Law School Attended

Harvard Law School
Class of 1966
cum laude

University Attended

Harvard College
Class of 1960
cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1938
Des Moines, Iowa, October 8, 1938

Associations & Memberships

Professional Memberships & Activities•State Bar of New Mexico (former member of Natural Resources Specialty Committee and Board of Directors of Natural Resources and ... More

Contact Information


(505) 954-3903


(505) 954-3942


Send email to Mark K. Adams

Office Information
Mark K. Adams
 315 Paseo de Peralta,
Santa Fe, NM 87501


Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A. (Santa Fe, New Mexico)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.