Sam J. Polverino

Attorney in San Jose, CA
Instructor: Trial Techniques, Santa Clara University School of Law, 1986-1991, 1995—. Faculty: University of San Francisco School of Law, Intensive Advocacy Program, 1992-—; Stanford University School of Law, Trial Skills Program, 1994—. Lecturer: Santa Clara County Public Defender's Office, 1991-1993. Speaker: Department of Justice, Sexual Assault Seminar-San Jose State University, 1987-1990. Listed in Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Crimes
  • White Collar Crime
  • Homicide
  • 3 Strikes
  • Fraud
  • Juvenile
  • Sex Offenses
  • DUI
  • Internet Crimes
  • Theft

Rating Not Shown
This lawyer has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by his or her clients.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1979, California, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth and Ninth Circuits
1987, U.S. Supreme Court

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    University of San Francisco
    Class of 1976

    University Attended

    Santa Clara University
    Class of 1973

    Birth Information

    Born in 1951
    San Jose, California, July 10, 1951


    1st Lt., U.S. Army, 1977-1981

    Associations & Memberships

    Santa Clara County Bar Association (President, 1993); California Attorneys for Criminal Justice (Member, 1988—); California Public Defender's Association (Member, 1981—); National ... More


    (Certified Specialist, Criminal Law, The State Bar of California Board Of Legal Specialization)

    Contact Information



    Office Information
    Sam J. Polverino
     75 East Santa Clara Street, Suite 295,
    San Jose, CA 95113-1826


    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.