Law Office of Rebecca Hughes Tran

Law Firm in San Jose, CA
Practicing Exclusively Family Law. Call (408)978-9321 to schedule a free

Free Consultation

Peer Rating N/A help_info

About This Firm

Rebecca Tran is a lawyer practicing exclusively Family Law. The firm handles divorce, legal separation, custody and visitation, spousal support, child support and complex property division cases. Rebecca Tran has been a practicing attorney in Santa Clara County for 15 years. The office serves Santa Clara County, including Palo Alto, Los Altos, San Jose, Los Gatos, Mountain View, Saratoga, Monte Sereno, Santa Clara, Campbell, Milpitas, Gilroy, Morgan Hill, Cupertino and Sunnyvale.

Rebecca Tran serves as Judge Pro Tem in Superior Court at mandatory settlement conferences. She served for two years on the Santa Clara County Bar Association Judiciary Committee, which evaluates judicial candidates at the request of the California governor. She is a graduate of Smith College and the University of California, Davis, School of Law.

She is a member of the Vietnamese American Bar Association of Northern California and a volunteer for Maitri. She served for two years on the Board of Managers of the YMCA of Santa Clara Valley, Central Branch and the Santa Clara County Women Lawyers Committee. Before opening her own practice she spent six years at the firm McManis Faulkner where she was lead associate attorney on a number of high-asset divorce cases. Before becoming a lawyer she was a reporter for the Gilroy Dispatch.

Rebecca Tran develops a strategy for each case and is available to her clients. Her knowledge of the family law process allows her to handle cases efficiently and decisively, keeping costs to a minimum. The firm uses the latest technology and can handle even the most document-intensive cases effectively, reducing the cost of the case.

The firm represents clients in both contested divorce and mediated divorce. A divorce is contested when the issues are tried in court. The spouses in a mediated divorce jointly hire Rebecca as the sole lawyer to assist them in filing all necessary papers, negotiating and drafting an agreement without bringing issues to the court.

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Mediation
  • Property Division
  • Business Valuation
  • Domestic Partners
  • Legal Separation
  • Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act
  • Appellate Practice
  • Divorce Mediation
  • Child Custody Mediation
  • Spousal Support
  • Marital Property Settlements
  • Marital Property Law
  • Fathers Rights.
  • Marital Property Distribution.
  • Domestic Violence
  • Restraining Orders
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Marital Agreements
  • Matrimonial Law
  • No Fault Divorce
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Post Nuptial Agreements
  • Post Divorce Modification
  • Visitation Rights
  • Termination of Parental Rights
  • Parental Rights
  • Parenting Time
  • Marital Property Distribution
  • Family Mediation

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
4.9 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 5 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 05/26/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

Legal Community Activity

Firm Details

Firm Size


Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation

Contact Information

Firm Address

Law Office of Rebecca Hughes Tran
The Garden Alameda 1570 The Alameda, Suite 212,
San Jose, CA 95126-2330






Send email to Law Office of Rebecca Hughes Tran

Office Information
The Garden Alameda 1570 The Alameda, Suite 212,
San Jose, CA 95126-2330


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.