Diemer, Whitman & Cardosi, LLP LinkedIn

Law Firm in San Jose, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Business Dissolution
  • Contested Business Dissolution
  • Minority shareholder Oppression
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
  • Usurpation of Corporation
  • Preference Litigation
  • Fraudulent Conveyances
  • Lien Avoidance
  • Bankruptcy Reclamation
  • Wage and Hour Claims
  • Employee Discrimination Claims
  • Employment Status Claims
  • Wrongful Discharge Claims
  • Qui Tam
  • Whistleblower Claims
  • Sexual Harassment
  • WARN Act Claims
  • Business Litigation
  • Business Contract Disputes
  • Partnership Disputes
  • Fraud Litigation
  • Unfair Competition
  • Telecommunications Law
  • Employment Law
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Discrimination
  • Commercial Collection Actions
  • Antitrust Violations.
  • Federal Trademark Infringement
  • Copyright Laws
  • Business Contracts
  • Employment Agreements
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Commercial Debt Collection
  • Creditors' Rights
  • Consumer Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 7
  • Chapter 13
  • Business Bankruptcy
  • Reclamation Actions
  • Temporary Injunctions
  • Preferential Transfer Litigation
  • Writs of Attachment
  • Writs of Possession
  • Motions for Relief from Stay
  • Litigation relating to Unsecured, Secured, and Administrative Claims
  • Secured Transactions
  • Foreclosures and Repossessions
  • Garnishments
  • Non-Dischargeability Actions
  • Intellectual Property
  • Trade Secret
  • Copyrights
  • Trade name or Trademark Infringement
  • Violations of Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreements

Peer Rating


Average Peer Rating

Based on this firm's rated lawyers
4.4 out of 5.0
  • Lawyers rated at this firm meet very high criteria of general ethical standards
4.4 out of 5.0

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.