Todd A. Walburg

Attorney in San Francisco, CA
Obtaining Justice for the Injured

Chair of Lieff Cabraser's Auto and Transportation Cases section of the firm's Torts Practice Group, Todd A. Walburg focuses much of his practice on personal injury and products liability litigation involving serious injuries and wrongful death.

Todd is currently involved in several trials against Big Tobacco in Florida for the injuries and fatalities caused by cigarettes . He also represents plaintiffs in litigation against Takata for defective airbags , GM for faulty ignition systems , and Toyota for sudden unintended acceleration accidents across the United States. In the Toyota and GM cases in federal court, Todd works closely with Co-Lead Counsel Elizabeth J. Cabraser, and in the state court, Todd was appointed to the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee for the Toyota Unintended Acceleration JCCP by the Honorable Lee Smalley Edmon of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Todd was previously involved in litigation against Yamaha Motor Corporation relating to multiple Rhino ATV rollover cases . He is an original member of the Tire Safety Group, a nationwide network of preeminent attorneys who handle product liability cases against tire manufacturers and dealers. Todd brings to bear his considerable experience with a variety of automotive defect cases, emphasizing vehicle crashworthiness, tire failure defects, fuel tank fires, rollovers, and seatbelt failures.

Todd has also represented victims of defective medical devices and pharmaceutical drugs, such as Guidant implantable defibrillators and pacemakers , Medtronic heart leads , Ortho-McNeil contraceptive patches, Baycol, Vioxx , and Fen-Phen . In addition, Todd was a key member of the litigation team in the groundbreaking University of Phoenix whistleblower case, which was resolved for $78.5 million.

Todd has served on the San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association Board of Directors since 2013, and has been an Alameda-Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association Board of Governors member since 2012. In 1998, he was the national winner of the Leesfield/Association of Trial Lawyers of America scholarship. Todd has also been a legal services volunteer for the Bar Association of San Francisco's Eviction Defense Project since 2012.

Todd is the author of Powerful Mediation Briefs in The Verdict (ACCTLA 2006). He was also the keynote speaker in presentations entitled Products Liability Strategies before Trial (SFTLA 2008), Toyota Unintended Acceleration Litigation (CAOC Annual Convention 2011), Burn Injury Cases (SFTLA/CAOC 2012), Cutting Edge Damages (SFTLA/CAOC 2013; with NJP Litigation Consulting), and Comparing and Contrasting the GM Litigation and the Toyota Litigation (AAJ 2014). In addition, Super Lawyers named Todd a 2014 Super Lawyer for Northern California, and a Rising Star for Northern California, from 2010 - 2013.

Published Works
•Cutting Edge Damges, SFTLA/COAC Webinar with NJP Litigaton Consulting, February 2013
•Burn Injury Cases, SFTLA/CAOC Webinar, December 2012
•Toyota Unintended Acceleration Litigation, CAOC Annual Convention, November 2011
•Product Liability Strategies Before Trial, SFTLA Roundtable, October 2008
•Powerful Mediation Briefs in The Verdict, ACCTLA, 2006

Honors and Awards
•Super Lawyer for Northern California, Super Lawyers, 2014
•Rising Star for Northern California, Super Lawyers, 2010 - 2013
•Elected to the Board of Directors of the San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association, 2013 - Present
•Appointed to the Board of Governors of the Alameda-Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association, 2012 - Present
•Leesfield / Association of Trial Lawyers of America Scholarship, National Winner, 1998

Past Employment Positions
•Emison Hullverson Bonagofsky, LLP, Partner, 2007 - 2008
•Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Associate, 2005 - 2007
•Bennett, Johnson & Galler, Associate, 2001 - 2005

Pro Bono Activities
•Eviction Defense Project, Volunteer Legal Services Program of the Bar Association of San Francisco (2012 - Present)

In the News
•November 7, 2014
Airbag Recall Update: Takata Allegedly Knew 10 Years Ago of Deadly Airbag Defect
•August 22, 2014
Portable Butane Stove Burn Injuries Still Cause Unnecessary Harm
•August 15, 2014
Car Fires and Fuel Tank Explosions Remain an Ongoing National Concern
•July 8, 2014
22 Lieff Cabraser Attorneys Selected as 2014 Northern California Super Lawyers or Rising Stars
•June 2, 2014
What Does GM's Fine by NHTSA for Faulty Ignition Mean for Victims?

415-956-1000
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Consumer Protection
  • Defective Products

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 2001, California
2001, U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
2001, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
2006, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
2006, U.S. District Court, Central District of California
2006, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California

Law School Attended

University of San Francisco School of Law
Class of 1999
J.D.

University Attended

University of California at Los Angeles
Class of 1995
B.A.

Associations & Memberships

Professional Associations and Memberships
•Alameda-Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association (Board of Governors, 2003 - 2005, 2012 - 2013)
•American Assoc... More

Representative Cases

Representative Cases; Fen-Phen Diet Drugs; GM Faulty Ignition Recall; Medtronic Heart Lead Recall; Toyota Accident; Vioxx; Yamaha Rhino

Community Contributions

Contact Information

Phone

415-956-1000

Fax

415-956-1008

Email

Send email to Todd A. Walburg


Office Information
Todd A. Walburg
Partner
Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor,
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339

Loading...

Logo
Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP (San Francisco, California)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.