Gary S. Fergus

Attorney in San Francisco, CA

My experience includes more than 125 weeks of trial in complex high-value cases in federal and state courts and regulatory administrative trials throughout the United States. In 2001, I opened my own practice to help clients resolve complex disputes and to address fundamental civil wrongs. Based near Silicon Valley, I have handled intellectual property matters in different high-tech sectors including telecommunications, wireless technology, security systems industry, and computer software.

Big Firm Experience

Before founding Fergus, A Law Office, at the end of 2001, I practiced for 22 years as a trial lawyer in one of the top 30 national law firms, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP. I was one of that firm's senior trial partners and managed their largest litigation group while maintaining an active trial practice in bet-the-company cases.

Small Firm Attention

Because I am a sole practitioner, all my clients get the benefit of my 29 years of experience, my attention to their problem and prompt responsive communications. Since opening my San Francisco office, I have represented plaintiffs and defendants at trial or in settlements that resolved complex litigation including intellectual property matters.

855-614-4152
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Internet Copyright Law
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Trade Secrets
  • Patent Infringement
  • Celebrity Right of Publicity
  • Intellectual Property Infringement
  • Intellectual Property
  • Literary Property
  • Artistic Property
  • Brand Management
  • Intellectual Property Enforcement
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Internet Intellectual Property
  • Proprietary Rights
  • Entertainment Litigation
  • Artists Rights
  • Music Copyright
  • Trade Secret Misappropriation
  • Music Licensing
  • Music Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Entertainment Contracts
  • Patents
  • Computer and Software Patents
  • Design Patents
  • Internet Patents
  • Patent Litigation
  • Patent Interference Practice
  • Copyrights
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Copyright Litigation
  • Software Copyright
  • Software Protection
  • Information Technology Contracts
  • Theft of Trade Secrets

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1979, Wisconsin
1981, California
District of Columbia
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth, Seventh and Ninth Circuits
U.S. Supreme Court

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Wisconsin-Madison
    Class of 1979
    J.D.
    cum laude

    New York University
    Class of 1981
    LL.M.
    with honors

    University Attended

    Stanford University
    Class of 1976
    A.B.
    Economics, with honors

    Birth Information

    Born in 1954
    Racine, Wisconsin, 1954

    Languages

    English

    Associations & Memberships

    State Bar of California; State Bar of Wisconsin; American Bar Association; American Intellectual Property Law Association.

    Contact Information

    Fax

    415-537-9038 Call Now

    Email

    Send email to Gary S. Fergus


    Office Information
    Gary S. Fergus
    Member
     595 Market Street, Suite 2430,
    San Francisco, CA 94105

    Loading...

    Logo
    Fergus, A Law Office (San Francisco, California)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.