Doan Law Group

Law Firm in San Clemente, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Bankruptcy Chapter 7
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 11
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 13
  • Creditor Abuse Prevention.
  • Creditor Harassment
  • Foreclosure Options
  • Debt Resolution

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Bankruptcy
3.7 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 21 reviews
  • Recommended by 16 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 12/09/13
Posted by a Consumer on 12/09/13
1.0 out of 5.0
I retained Doan Law Firm in August of 2013. I completed all required documentation immediately & returned it immediately. I was contacted by Kevin Tang & had been in touch with him a few times. Then in November he told me there was a problem with filing the bankruptcy & I would need to speak with Greg Doan directly. I contacted him and as of 11/14 he was going to review my case. I have heard NOTHING. Very unhappy with the way this firm responds. I was the one always having to initiate contact.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 04/10/13
1.8 out of 5.0
I was sold a service by a rep for the firm who misrepresented the service and now no longer works for the company. When i made them aware of the issue, they handled things very poorly and did not make me feel as though they had any interest in resolving the issue. In the end, I ended my dealings with them and hired another lawyer to handle my bankruptcy case. They only offered a partial refund even though i made them aware of what the rep "sold" me. I would NEVER deal with them again.
No Photo
Law firm response:
Please call Attorney James Doan at 888 DOAN LAW so I can resolve your issues to your satisfaction. We care about our clients and have helped over 40,000 in the last two decades.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.