David Lopez LinkedIn

Attorney in San Antonio, TX
Phi Beta Kappa. Named, Texas Super Lawyer, 2004. Editor, Harvard Law Review, 1987-1988. Author: Mexican Law, Oxford, 2002; NAFTA Coursebook, West, 2007. Professor of Law, St. Mary's Law School, 1993-2001. Visiting Professor of Law, University of California-Davis Law School, 1998-1999. Member, Million Dollar Advocates Forum, 2007. Formerly with: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Davis, Cedillo & Mendoza, Inc., San Antonio and San Antonio Community Law Center.
866-585-0118
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

Commercial LitigationMexican Law
Commercial Litigation
50%
Mexican Law
50%

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1988, Texas
1990, California

Law School Attended

Harvard University
Class of 1988
J.D.
cum laude

University Attended

Georgetown University
Class of 1985
B.S.F.S.
magna cum laude

Languages

Spanish

Associations & Memberships

San Antonio, American and Mexican-American Bar Associations.

Contact Information

Phone

210-222-9494

Email

Send email to David Lopez


Office Information
David Lopez
Partner
 2161 N.W. Military Highway, Suite 400,
San Antonio, TX 78213-1844

Loading...

Logo
Pulman, Cappuccio, Pullen, Benson & Jones LLP (San Antonio, Texas)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.