John R. Lund LinkedIn

Attorney in Salt Lake City, UT

"John’s examinations and presentations to the jury were masterful. We trusted them, and they delivered for us.” - Timothy Vetter, Vice President for the Canyons.

Mr. Lund focuses his practice on commercial litigation and the defense of catastrophic product liability, professional liability, and insurance bad faith cases throughout the Intermountain West. With a thirty-year passion for trial practice, Mr. Lund has earned his place as a go-to attorney for clients with high-stakes cases.

One of the most highly regarded trial lawyers in Utah, Mr. Lund is recognized by Chambers USA as one of Utah's leading lawyers for commercial litigation. He is also named as one of the Best Lawyers in America for Products Liability Litigation.

Chambers USA writes: John Lund's recent trial successes have served to bolster his already healthy reputation in the local market. He is experienced at dealing with the most complex of commercial disputes. In 2011 Mr. Lund obtained one of the largest commercial jury verdicts ever awarded in the state of Utah: over $54 million. Mr. Lund is also a leader of the Bar serving as a Utah Bar Commissioner and chairs the Supreme Court’s Advisory Committee on Evidence. He also serves as a Utah State Bar representative on the Judicial Council. On a national level Mr. Lund serves as the President of The Harmonie Group, an international network of elite and vetted law firms providing defense services to corporations, TPA's and insurance companies.

In collaboration with the late Mr. Harold G. Christensen, Mr. Lund developed an innovative specialty service called Snow Trial Services, which provides mock trials, juror focus groups, trial case evaluations, and other trial consultation services.

Admission & Memberships

Utah State Bar, 1984

Wyoming State Bar, 2005

Colorado State Bar, 2006

Member, Utah Judicial Council (Administrative body of the Utah Judiciary)

Advocate, American Board of Trial Advocates

Fellow, American Bar Foundation

President, The Harmonie Group

Chair, Advisory Committee on Evidence, Utah Supreme Court

Third District Commissioner, Utah State Bar

Member, Model Utah Jury Instruction Committee – Civil

Past President, Salt Lake County Bar Association

Of Note

Recognized in Chambers USA, Americas Leading Lawyers for Business, Commercial Litigation

Recognized by Mountain States Super Lawyers since 2007

Recognized by Best Lawyers – US News and World Report since 2008

2013 Lawyer of the Year for Product Liability Defense

AV Preeminent Rating (5.0) Martindale Hubbell

Utah Legal Elite 2008 - 2013

801-322-9167
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction
  • Insurance
  • Product Liability Defense
  • Professional Liability Defense
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Snow Trial Services
  • Trial Practice

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Shareholder

Admission Details

Admitted in 1984, Utah
2005, Wyoming
2006, Colorado

Law School Attended

University of Utah
Class of 1984
J.D.
National Moot Court Team

University Attended

University of Colorado
Class of 1981
B.A.
magna cum laude

Contact Information

Phone

801-322-9167

Email

Send email to John R. Lund


Office Information
John R. Lund
Shareholder
 10 Exchange Place, Eleventh Floor, P.O. Box 45000,
Salt Lake City, UT 84145

Loading...

Logo
Snow, Christensen & Martineau, P.C. (Salt Lake City, Utah)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.