W. Courtney LaFon

Attorney in Roswell, GA
Member, Board of Directors, 1981, 1982, 1984 and Secretary, 1984, North Fulton Bar Association. Counsel for Roswell United Methodist Foundation, Inc.
770-360-7000

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Collection Law
  • Probate Law
  • Estates
  • Real Estate Law

 

Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates, Criminal Law and Real Estate
4.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.8
Responsiveness
4.2
Quality of Service
4.0
Value for Money
3.8

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 10/03/13
Posted by a Consumer on 10/03/13
Recommended
4.5 out of 5.0
Have used Mr. LaFon for over 30 years. My parents and many friends use him too. He spends quality time with all of us. He has never been anything less than professional and helpful.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 04/13/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr. LaFon is a fantastic attorney, and an upstanding member of the community.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1978, Georgia and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia
1979, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia
1980, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth and Eleventh Circuits
1982, U.S. Tax Court

Law School Attended

Emory University
Class of 1978
J.D.

University Attended

Tennessee Technological University
Class of 1972
B.S.

Birth Information

Born in 1950
Jacksonville, North Carolina, November 21, 1950

Military

With U.S. Army, 1972-1975; Retired LTC, JAGC, U.S. Army Reserves, 1975-1995

Associations & Memberships

Atlanta Bar Association; State Bar of Georgia; Georgia Trial Lawyers Association.

Contact Information

Phone

770-360-7000

Email

Send email to W. Courtney LaFon


Office Information
W. Courtney LaFon
Member
Office at Oakbrook 1301 Bombay Lane,
Roswell, GA 30076-5823

Loading...


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.