Floyd Shapiro

Attorney in Roseland, NJ
Secretary, District V-B Ethics Committee, 1984-1985. Member, Vice Chair, 1985— and Chair to 1989, Trustee, 1987-1990, Secretary, 1991, Treasurer, 1992, President-Elect, 1993 and President, 1994, Essex County Bar Association. Trustee, New Jersey State Bar Association, 1996-2002. Member, Supreme Court of New Jersey District Fee Arbitration Committee for Essex County, District V-C, 2002-2005; ECBA Pro Bono Attorney Achievement Award, 1994; Professional Lawyer of the Year Award (Essex County), NJ Commission on Professionalism and the Law, 2000; ECBA Samuel S. Saiber Lifetime Professional Achievement Award, 2006.
(973) 622-6200
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Transactions
  • Business Law
  • Real Estate


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials


Of Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in 1960, New Jersey
1975, U.S. Supreme Court
1977, Florida
1981, U.S. Tax Court and New York
U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    Rutgers University School of Law
    Class of 1959

    University Attended

    Rutgers University School of Business
    Class of 1958

    Birth Information

    Born in 1935
    Newark, New Jersey, August 4, 1935

    Associations & Memberships

    Essex County, New Jersey State and American (Member, Sections on: Corporation, Banking and Business Law) Bar Associations;

    Bar Fellowship

    American Bar Foundation.

    Contact Information


    (973) 622-6200


    (973) 622-3073


    Send email to Floyd Shapiro

    Office Information
    Floyd Shapiro
    Of Counsel
     101 Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 400,
    Roseland, NJ 07068-1097


    Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel, P.A. (Roseland, New Jersey)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.