Anthony Coppola

Attorney in Roseland, NJ
Anthony Coppola, Esq., has over nineteen years of experience in Commercial and Civil Litigation, Commercial and Residential Real Estate, Landlord-Tenant, and Transactional Law. His current case load includes insurance defense litigation and commercial litigation. Mr. Coppola is an experienced trial litigator, whose extensive experience in that area provides the firm's clients with the opportunity to vett out all issues in the contested matters he handles. He is also an experienced court appointed mediator, whose skills in mediating between often contentious adversaries have resulted in settling a variety of cases, including commercial dispute and premise liability matters. Qualified Mediator under New Jersey Court Rule 1:40.
973-797-1100
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Civil Litigation
  • Transactional Law
  • Insurance Defense
  • Landlord Tenant Law

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Attorney

Admission Details

Admitted in 1992, New Jersey
U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey

Law School Attended

Seton Hall School of Law
Class of 1990
J.D.

University Attended

Montclair State College
Class of 1986
B.A.

Languages

Italian

Associations & Memberships

Hudson County and New Jersey State Bar Associations; New Jersey Defense Association, District VI, Hudson County (Member, Ethics Committee).

Contact Information

Phone

973-797-1100

Fax

973-228-2679

Email

Send email to Anthony Coppola


Office Information
Anthony Coppola
Attorney
 105 Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 302,
Roseland, NJ 07068-0490

Loading...

Logo
Stern, Lavinthal & Frankenberg, LLC (Roseland, New Jersey)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.