Lance B. Thurman

Attorney in Rolla, MO

Professional Memberships: Missouri Bar Association; Phelps County Bar Association (President 2009); National District Attorneys Association; National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys

Government Service: Assistant General counsel - Missouri State Tax Commission (2001-2003); Assistant Prosecuting Attorney - Phelps County, Missouri (2003-2007); City Attorney - Doolittle and Edgar Springs, Missouri; Police Personnel Board - City of Rolla, Missouri.

Credit Cards Accepted

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Municipal Law
  • Civil Litigation


Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Business Law and Criminal Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 07/30/13
Posted by a Consumer on 07/30/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Lance Thurman is an outstanding attorney. He is extremely knowledgable understands the application of law better than most. I feel very fortunate to have him as an advocate and would recommend him, without hesitation.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2001, Missouri

Credit Cards Accepted
Law School Attended

University of Missouri, Columbia
Class of 2001

University Attended

Truman State University
Class of 1998

Birth Information

Born in 1974
Canton, Illinois, September 19, 1974

Contact Information


573-341-2266 Call Now




Send email to Lance B. Thurman

Office Information
Lance B. Thurman
 901 North Pine Street, 4th Floor,
Rolla, MO 65401-3141


Williams, Robinson, Rigler & Buschjost, P.C. (Rolla, Missouri)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.