Gregory A. Franklin

Attorney in Rochester, NY
Selected for inclusion in the New York Super Lawyers Upstate Edition, 2008, 2009, 2010. Editor-in-Chief, Fordham University School of Law Moot Court Board. Best National Brief, 1983, Jessup International Law Moot Court. Founding Member, Adoption Resource Network, Inc. Chairman, Regional Advisory Council of the New York State Division of Human Rights. Frequent Lecturer: Adoption-Related topics; Continuing Legal Education Seminars; Bar Associations; Parent Groups. Authored, numerous articles on adoption-related topics. Expert Witness in Adoption-Related Litigation. Past Chair, Regional Advisory Counsel, New York State Division of Human Rights. Past Chair, Adoption Resource Network at Hillside Children's Center, Rochester, New York.
888-975-5670
  • Adoption Law
  • Family Law
  • Real Estate
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Civil Appeals
  • Appellate Practice
  • Children
  • Agency Adoptions
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Fathers Rights
  • Foster Care
  • Grandparents Custody
  • Grandparents Visitation Rights
  • Independent Adoptions
  • International Adoptions
  • Interstate Adoptions
  • Parental Rights
  • Living Wills
  • Parenting Time
  • Private Adoptions
  • Step Parent Adoptions
  • Surrogacy Law
  • Termination of Parental Rights
  • Third Party Custody
  • Visitation Rights
  • Domestic Relations
  • Gay and Lesbian Family Law
  • Paternity
  • Real Estate Acquisitions
  • Real Estate Contracts
  • Real Estate Sales
  • Real Property
  • Residential Real Estate
  • Residential Real Estate Acquisitions
  • Residential Real Estate Sales
  • Right of Way Easements
  • Wills

 

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 5 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 05/07/13
Posted by a Consumer on 05/07/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Wonderful lawyer!!
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1985, New York and U.S. District Court, Western District of New York

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Fordham University
    Class of 1984
    J.D.
    Editor-in-Chief, Fordham University School of Law Moot Court Board, Best National Brief, Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition, 1983

    University Attended

    Grinnell College
    Class of 1978
    A.B.
    Political Science

    Birth Information

    Born in 1956
    New York, N.Y., April 12, 1956

    Associations & Memberships

    American Academy of Adoption Attorneys (Past Chair, International Adoption Subcommittee); American Academy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys, New York Attorneys For Family Forma... More

    Bar Fellowship

    American Academy of Adoption Attorneys (Past Chair, International Adoption Subcommittee); American Academy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys.

    Representative Cases

    In re Adoption of Caitlin, DOCKET NOS. A-39/40-93, DOCKET NOS. A-41/42-93, FAMILY COURT OF NEW YORK, MONROE COUNTY, 163 Misc. 2d 999; 622 N.Y.S.2d 835; 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 630, January 6, 1994; In re Adoption of Carolyn B., CAF 03-01032 , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, 6 A.D.3d 67; 774 N.Y.S.2d 227; 2004 N.Y. Ap... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    585-442-0540 Call Now

    Fax

    585-442-6889

    Email

    Send email to Gregory A. Franklin


    Office Information
    Gregory A. Franklin
    Member
     150 Allens Creek Road,
    Rochester, NY 14618

    Loading...

    Logo
    Ashcraft Franklin Young & Peters, LLP (Rochester, New York)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.