James J. O'Keeffe

Attorney in Roanoke, VA
Jay O'Keeffe focuses his practice on appeals and trusts-and-estates litigation. On the appellate side, he helps people both to bring appeals and to resist them, securing their results in the trial court. He has briefed and argued numerous cases before the Supreme Court of Virginia and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Jay publishes a blog, De Novo, at www.virginiaappellatelaw.com , and has been repeatedly recognized for his appellate work. Jay's fiduciary-litigation practice helps people to realize - and protect - their plans for their family, finances, and health.

Seminars/Events
•Technology and the Litigation Practice, 02/22/2013
• Legal Protections for Writers, 01/26/2013
• Social Media presenter, Backpack to Briefcase: The New Virginia Lawyer, 11/14/2012
• Practical Tips for Complying with FOIA after Hill v. Fairfax County School Board, 10/05/2012
• Know Your Audience: Reintroducing the Changing Supreme Court of Virginia, 10/02/2012
• Less Paper, More Fun: iPad for Lawyers, 05/30/2012
• Better Legal Writing, at VBA/VSB Appellate Summit, 04/25/2012
• Attorney Coaching: Creating the Next Generation of Rainmakers Webinar, 12/08/2010

Published Work

Read Jay's Blog, De Novo at www.virginiaappellatelaw.com
•Co-author, Social Media and Discovery -- New Tools, Same Rules; The VADA Journal of Civil Litigation, Vol. XXII, No. 4, Winter 2010-2011.
•Co-author, Something Old, Something New: The Partial Final Judgment Rule ; VSB Litigation News, Volume XV Number III (Fall 2010).
•Co-author, Thoughts on Trying Construction Cases: An Appellate Perspective; Virginia State Bar Construction Law and Public Contracts News, Issue No. 56 (Spring 2010).
•Co-author, Have You Made A Last-ditch, Desperate, and Disingenuous Attempt to Subvert the Legal Process Today?; Virginia Lawyer Magazine, Volume 57 (February 2009).

Experience
•Briefed and argued numerous cases before the Supreme Court of Virginia and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
•Representative appeals include Lewis v. City of Alexandria, 756 S.E.2d 465 (Va. 2014); Hill v. Crum, 727 F.3d 312 (4th Circuit 2013); S.L.M. v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., 514 Fed. Appx. 389 (4th Cir. 2013); VanBuren v. Grubb, 284 Va. 584, 733 S.E.2d 919 (2012); Jarmak v. Ramos, 497 Fed. Appx. 289 (2012); VanBuren v. Grubb, 471 Fed. Appx. 228 (4th Cir. 2012); Bonham v. Weinraub, 413 Fed. Appx. 615 (4th Circuit 2011); Rascher v. Friend, 279 Va. 370, 689 S.E.2d 661, Dunn Construction Co., Inc. v. Cloney, 278 Va. 260, 682 S.E.2d 943 (2009); Kennedy v. Joy Technologies, Inc., 269 Fed. Appx. 302 (4th Cir. 2008); Switzer v. Switzer, 273 Va. 326, 641 S.E.2d 80 (2007)
•Represents plaintiffs and defendants in civil matters in state and federal trial courts
•Maintains a regular trial court practice
•Associated with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP before joining Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore

News
• 27 Gentry Locke Attorneys Named to Lists of 2014 Virginia Super Lawyers and Rising Stars, 06/13/2014
• Gentry Locke Attorneys Named to 2013 Legal Elite, 11/27/2013
• Twenty-five Gentry Locke Attorneys Named to Virginia Super Lawyers for 2013, 06/14/2013
• Gentry Locke, Attorneys Noted in 3 Benchmark Litigation Publications, 08/29/2012
• Twenty-four Gentry Locke Attorneys Named to Virginia Super Lawyers for 2012, 06/15/2012
• Twelve Gentry Locke Lawyers Named to 2012 Virginia Legal Elite, 12/04/2011
• Gentry Locke Adds New Commercial Litigator, 07/03/2006

Articles
• How to Get a Writ Granted and Other Tips from the Justices, 03/31/2014
• I Am Richard Posner...and So Can You?, 11/08/2013
• What to Bring to Oral Argument, 09/27/2013
• How the Fourth Circuit Decides Whether to Award Oral Argument, 09/04/2013
• Gentry Locke Involved with First Significant E-Discovery Decision in Western Virginia, 02/16/2007

Awards
•Listed in Benchmark Appellate as a Local Litigation Star (2013)
•Designated as one of the Legal Elite by Virginia Business magazine for Appellate Law (2012-2013)
•Named a Virginia Super Lawyers Rising Star in Appellate Law (2010-2014) and Business Litigation (2008-2009)

540-983-9459
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.6 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Appellate
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Estates
  • Probate & Trust Litigation

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

in Appellate Practice and Litigation
4.6 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
4.7
Analytical Capabilities
4.7
Judgment
4.7
Communication Ability
4.8
Legal Experience
4.4

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 12/13/13
4.4 out of 5.0
Jay is a very capable, bright, conscientious young lawyer who is of the highest integrity.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 12/05/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Jay is an outstanding lawyer and a fine person. He merits your highest rating.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 12/05/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I have hired Mr. O'Keeffe to assist as co-counsel in an appeal and his work was top-notch. He also shows excellent judgment. Definitely my go-to guy for appellate work.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 12/05/13
4.8 out of 5.0
Jay is a first rate lawyer, and is responsible for an appellate blog in Virginia that is a must read.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 2002, Virginia
2003, District of Columbia

Credit Cards Accepted
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Harvard Law School
    Class of 2002
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University Attended

    College of William and Mary
    Class of 1999
    B.A.
    magna cum laude

    Associations & Memberships

    Affiliations
    •Virginia State Bar; Member (2002-Present); Appellate Subcommittee (2009-Present); Trusts and Estates Section (2014-Present)
    •Faculty Mem... More

    Representative Cases

    Rascher v. Friend, 689 S.E.2d 661 (Va. 2010); Dunn Construction Co., Inc. v. Cloney, 278 Va. 260, 692 S.E.2d 943 (2009); Switzer v. Switzer, 641 S.E.2d 80; 2007 Va. LEXIS 34; Kennedy v. Joy Techs., Inc. 269 Fed. Appx. 302 (4th Cir. 2008).

    Contact Information

    Phone

    540-983-9459

    Fax

    540-983-9400

    Email

    Send email to James J. O


    Office Information
    James J. O'Keeffe
    Partner
    SunTrust Plaza 10 Franklin Road SE, Suite 800,
    Roanoke, VA 24011

    Loading...

    Logo
    Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore, LLP (Roanoke, Virginia)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.