Charles H. (Trey) Smith, III

Attorney in Roanoke, VA
Trey Smith is a partner at Gentry Locke who focuses his practice on the representation of plaintiffs in personal injury and wrongful death cases. Over his 20 years with Gentry Locke, Trey has taken to trial cases involving medical malpractice, products liability, premises liability, private and commercial motor vehicle accidents, defamation, malicious prosecution, and toxic exposure, among others.

•Attained 1.1 million dollar verdict in Tazewell County, Virginia for 59 year old female plaintiff in case involving the failure to diagnose colon cancer
•Successfully represented parents of 27 year old, mentally handicapped young man who died of complications of pneumonia less than 3 weeks after his family admitted him to a State rehabilitation facility
•Successfully represented 87 year old female at trial who, when undergoing surgery to repair her fractured hip, awoke to find that the doctor pinned and plated the wrong hip
•Represented optometrist in federal court asserting RICO claims against former employees and office manager who misappropriated her patient list and solicited her patients to the practice of a competing optometrist
•Represented restaurant owner in federal court contract action against national insurance company which denied fire loss coverage subsequent to accidental fire which destroyed steakhouse in Winston Salem, N.C.
•Represented parents of 53 year old, incompetent man who sustained numerous falls at defendant rehabilitation facility resulting in severely comminuted knee fracture and loss of mobility
•Received favorable verdict on behalf of truck driver for large-chain grocery store who was injured in a 3-car accident
•Represent family of 41 year old coal miner killed while operating a remotely controlled, continuous miner manufactured by Joy Mining, Inc.
•Drafted Brief Amicus Curiae for VTLA in matter of Bostic v. Kuney which was successfully appealed to Virginia Supreme Court

•Designated as one of the Legal Elite by Virginia Business magazine (2006)

Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.9 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Products Liability
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Personal Injury
  • Commercial Litigation


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Litigation, Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice
4.9 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 07/01/14
5.0 out of 5.0
I have represented defendants in which Mr. Smith has represented the plaintiffs. He is unfailing prepared, tries an excellent case, and a handshake is sufficient from him, as far as I am concerned. He is one of the best all-around attorneys I have ever faced.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 06/27/14
5.0 out of 5.0
It is my opinion that Trey represents the very best in our profession and deserves to be rated accordingly.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 06/25/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Excellent lawyer. Highest recommendation.
Report abuse
Posted by a Judge on 06/25/14
4.4 out of 5.0
Excellent attorney.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1991, Virginia

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    College of William and Mary, Marshall-Wythe School of Law
    Class of 1991

    University Attended

    University of Virginia
    Class of 1987

    Associations & Memberships


    •Virginia Trial Lawyers Association
    •American Association for Justice

    Contact Information






    Send email to Charles H. (Trey) Smith, III

    Office Information
    Charles H. (Trey) Smith, III
    SunTrust Plaza 10 Franklin Road SE, Suite 800,
    Roanoke, VA 24011


    Gentry Locke, LLP (Roanoke, Virginia)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.