James D. Moran

Attorney in Riverhead, NY
Dean's List. Moot Court. Formerly with Davis & Hersh LLP. Former In House Counsel, Law Office of Robert Tusa.
631-779-4017
Free Consultation

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall
  • Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modification
  • Foreclosures
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Boating Accidents
  • Wrongful Death
  • Construction Accidents
  • Burn Victims
  • Brain Injuries
  • Catastrophic Injuries

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 05/25/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 2001, New York

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Pace University Law School
    Class of 1996
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Fordham University
    Class of 1990
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1968
    Bronx, New York, March 21, 1968

    Languages

    Spanish

    Associations & Memberships

    Suffolk County and Nassau County Bar Associations.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    631-208-8808 Call Now

    Email

    Send email to James D. Moran


    Office Information
    James D. Moran
    Member
     125 Roanoke Avenue,
    Riverhead, NY 11901

    Loading...

    Logo
    Law Office of James D. Moran (Riverhead, New York)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.