Christy D. Jones LinkedIn

Attorney in Ridgeland, MS

Distinctions

· "Product Liability Attorney of the Year" by LMG Life Sciences 2013

· Top 50 Mississippi Super Lawyers®, 2012

· The Best Lawyers in America® Lawyer of the Year, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants, 2013

· Past District 6 Regent and fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers

· AV-rated, Martindale-Hubbell

· Top 6 Product Liability Lawyers in the World, Best of the Best 2008, Expert Guides

· The Best Lawyers in America® Lawyer of the Year, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants

· The Best Lawyers in America®, Personal Injury Litigation, Product Liability Litigation

· Chambers USA, America's Leading Lawyers for Business, Litigation: General Commercial, Litigation: Trial Lawyers (Nationwide), Product Liability and Mass Torts (Nationwide), Product Liability: Pharmaceutical (Nationwide)

· Mid-South Super Lawyers®, Personal Injury Defense: Products

· International Who's Who of Product Liability Defense Lawyers 2010

· fellow, American Bar Foundation

· fellow, Mississippi Bar Foundation

· 2012 Professionalism Award, Mississippi Bar Foundation

· 2011-2012 Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America

· 2009 Professionalism Award, Hinds County Bar Association

· 2008 Outstanding Mississippi Woman Lawyer, Mississippi Women Lawyers Association

· Top Attorneys In The Mid-South, Memphis Magazine - December 2011

· Benchmark Litigation's Top 10 Female Litigators in America

· "National Star" by Benchmark Litigation Magazine, 2013

· "Litigation Star" by Benchmark Litigation Magazine, Fifth Edition

· "Life Science Star" by LMG Life Sciences 2012

· Top Product Liability Attorney in the World, Legal Media Group's Guide to the World's Leading Product Liability Lawyers.

Associations

· American College of Trial Lawyers fellow

· International Association of Trial Lawyers

· American Board of Trial Advocates

· Product Liability Advisory Council

· International Association of Defense Counsel
- Executive Committee 1994-97

· American Bar Association

· Defense Research Institute
- Drug and Device Committee Chair, 2001-03

· Lawyers for Civil Justice

· Defense Counsel Trial Academy Director, 1995

· Trial Attorneys of America

· Mississippi Bar Association

· Mississippi Defense Lawyers Association

· Capital Area Bar Association

Experience

· Commercial Arbitration: Saugatuck Capital Company Limited Partnership III v. Ford Motor Company.

· Commercial Arbitration: Challenger's Border Express, et al. v. Ford Motor Company.

· Jo Ann Sessner v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. - Second New Jersey bellwether product liability case involving prescription drug Fosamax (Lead Counsel); resulted in defense verdict (2012).

· Alison Rosenberg v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. - First New Jersey bellwether product liability trial involving prescription drug Fosamax (Lead Counsel) (2011).

· Robert Beare v. Johnson & Johnson, et al.- First New Jersey bellwether product liability case involving prescription drug Levaquin (Lead Counsel); resulted in defense verdict (2011).

· Paul Gaffney v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. - First New Jersey bellwether product liability case involving prescription drug Levaquin; (Lead Counsel); resulted in defense verdict (2011).

· Brianna Maya v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. - Philadelphia trial involving product liability case in connection with Children's Motrin and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (Lead Counsel); resulted in plaintiff verdict (2011).

· Christina Hoyt Hutto, et al. v. McNeil-PPC, Inc., et al. - wrongful death product liability action involving Tylenol (Lead Counsel) (La. 2010).

· Louise H. Maley v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. - New York trial involving second bellwether product liability case in connection with Fosamax (Lead Counsel); resulted in defense verdict (2010).

· Thomas B. Gaines v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. - California wrongful death action involving Children's Motrin and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (Trial Counsel); resulted in defense verdict (2010).

· Shirley Boles v. Merck & Co., Inc. - New York trial involving first bellwether product liability case involving prescription drug Fosamax (Trial Counsel); resulted in mistrial (2009).

· Kimberly Zundel, et al., v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., New Jersey trial product liability action involving Children's Motrin and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (Lead Counsel); resulted in defense verdict (2009).

· Sabrina Brierton Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson, et. al. California product liability action involving Children's Motrin and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (Lead Counsel); resulted in defense verdict (2008).

· Gary Albright v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al. Alabama Vioxx litigation (Trial Counsel); resulted in defense verdict (2006).

· Thomas Cona, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc. New Jersey Vioxx litigation (Lead Counsel); resulted in defense verdict in product liability claim (2006).

· John McDarby v. Merck & Co., Inc. New Jersey Vioxx litigation (Lead Counsel); resulted in plaintiff verdict (2006).

· Frederick Humeston, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc. New Jersey Vioxx litigation (Trial Counsel); resulted in defense verdict in product liability claim (2005).

· Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. v. Jackson, 883 So.2d 91 (Miss. 2004).

· Culbert v. Johnson & Johnson, 883 So.2d 550 (Miss. 2004).

· Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. v. Keys, 879 So.2d 446 (Miss. 2004).

· Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. v. Scott, 876 So.2d 306 (Miss. 2004).

· Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. v. Bailey, 878 So.2d 31 (Miss. 2004), is a decision of the Mississippi Supreme Court reversing a $48 million judgment awarded to ten plaintiffs in a product liability action involving a prescription drug.

· Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. v. Grant, 873 So.2d 100 (Miss. 2004).

· Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. v. Armond, 866 So.2d 1092 (Miss. 2004), is a decision of the Mississippi Supreme Court which significantly changed the landscape of litigation in Mississippi, declaring that joinder of plaintiffs in prescription drug cases, in many cases improper, was subject to strict scrutiny, resulting in severance of many claims and transfers to appropriate venues.

· Hardy v. Bayer Corporation and SmithKIine Beecham Corporation, 02cv108, Hinds County, Mississippi (2003), product liability action in which the Court granted a directed verdict in favor of SmithKline Beecham Corporation, a co-marketer of a prescription drug. Lead Trial Counsel for SmithKline Beecham.

· Bennett v. Madakasira, 821 So.2d 794 (Miss. 2002).

· Davis v. American Home Products Corporation, et al., District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Cause No. B-150, 760, was a product liability action involving a contraceptive product which resulted in a defense verdict on three of four plaintiffs' claims and a $38,000 award to the plaintiff on the other. Trial Counsel for Wyeth.

· Vonna Smith v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Circuit Court of Miller County, Arkansas, Cause No. CIV-93-1053, was a product liability case involving breast implants. The jury returned a defense verdict.

· Cruz Luevano v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, District Court of Zavala County Texas, Cause No. 94-04-08755CV, product liability action involving breast implants; resulted in defense verdict.

· Wilbanks v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust 1998 WL 433940 (N.D. Miss.), cert. denied ___U.S. ___ (2000). Summary judgment for defendant granted; Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.

· Kemp v. G. D. Searle and Co., 103 F.3d 405 (5th Cir. 1997), product liability action involving an intrauterine contraceptive, in which the trial court awarded summary judgment for the defendant; Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.

· Toon v.Lederle Laboratories American Cyanamid Co., 603 So.2d 245, cert. denied, 607 So.2d 556 (La. App. ___), product liability action involving childhood vaccines. The trial court in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, granted a directed verdict for the defendant, and the Louisiana appellate court affirmed.

· Andrew Jackson Life Ins. Co. v. Williams, 566 So.2d 1172 (Miss. 1990).

· Bernhardt By and Through Bernhardt v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 892 F.2d 440, 15 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1047 (5th Cir. (Miss.) 1990).

· Lindley v. Hamilton, 883 F.2d 360, Prod. Liab. Rep. (CCH) P 12, 262 (5th Cir. (Miss.) 1989).

· Bernhardt By and Through Bernhardt v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 723 F.Supp. 1188 (N.D. Miss. 1988).

· Presley v. South Cent. Bell Telephone Co., 684 F.Supp. 1397 (S.D.Miss. 1988).

· MGIC Indem. Corp. v. Central Bank of Monroe, La., 838 F.2d 1382 (5th Cir. (La.) 1988).

· Brown v. Credit Center, Inc., 444 So.2d 358 (Miss. 1983).

· General Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. American Air Filter Co., Inc., 696 F.2d 375 (5th Cir.(Miss.) 1983).

· Bickerstaff v. South Central Bell Telephone Co., 676 F.2d 163 (5th Cir.(Miss.) 1982).

· Burris v. South Central Bell Telephone Co., 540 F.Supp. 905 (S.D. Miss 1982).

· Borden, Inc. Universal Industries Corp., 88 F.R.D. 708 (N.D. Miss. 1981).

· Holley v. Funtime Skateland South, Inc., 392 So.2d 1135 (Miss. 1981).

· Hughes Const. Co., Inc. v. Rheem Mfg. Co., 487 F.Supp. 345 (N.D. Miss. 1980).

· Beco, Inc. v. American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co., 370 So.2d 1343 (Miss 1979).

· Fowler v. Allied Equipment, Inc., 368 So.2d 829 (Miss. 1979).

· Dillon v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, 366 So.2d 233 (Miss. 1979).

· Gulf Guaranty Life Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 363 So.2d 297 (Miss. 1978).

· Gulf Guaranty Life Ins. Co. v. Middleton, 361 So.2d 1377 (Miss. 1978).

· National Trial Team, silicone breast implant litigation, Baxter Healthcare Corporation.

· Nationwide Coordinator, various litigation, Champion International, Inc.

· Regional Counsel, vaccine litigation for American Cyanamid Co. (now American Home Products Corporation).

Papers, Presentations & Publications

· "The Historical Rationale for Punitive Damages; Its Evolution and Current Application," National Conference of Judicial Excellence (2009).

· "Early and Often: The Trial Responses to Proffered Evidence of a Guilty Plea in a Pharmaceutical or Medical Device Trial," Defense Research Institute (2006).

· "Cross Examining the Personal Injury Plaintiff," Young Lawyers Seminar, Defense Research Institute (2006).

· "Expert Witnesses Effective (Cross) Examination and Jury Communication," American Conference Institute 10th Anniversary Drug & Medical Device Litigation (2005).

· "Current Issues in Pharmaceutical Litigation and Policy," American Bar Association Product Liability Committee (2004).

· "Ladies and Gentlemen, This is Not the Lottery (Defense of Catastrophic Damage Cases)," Medical Malpractice and Healthcare Seminar, Defense Research Institute (2004).

· "Creative Approaches to Punitive Damages," Iowa Defense Lawyers Association (2002).

· "Technology in the Courtroom," Arkansas Bar Association (2002).

· Faculty, National Trial Academy, TIPS Section of ABA (2000).

· "Preserving the Attorney-Client Privilege," Issues Management in a Global Economy, IADC (1998).

· "Epidemiology : A Practical Approach Through Analogy," Drug and Device Seminar, Defense Research Institute (1998).

· "Discovery of Expert Witnesses in Mass Tort Litigation," Open Forum (1996), IADC.

· University of Michigan Advocacy Institute, Institute of Continuing Legal Education (1995).

· "Keys for Deposing Plaintiff's Expert," Trial Techniques Seminar, Defense Research Institute (1994).

· "Homeowners Insurance," Peoples Law Forum.

· "Cross-Examination of the Expert Witness," University of Mississippi Continuing Education Programs.

· "Successful Negotiation," Women, Power and Advocacy, MTLA.

· "Opening Statements," Continuing Legal Education Program, IADC.

· "Gagging The Expert Witness," Open Forum (1992), IADC.

· "Use of Scientific Literature at Trial," Drug and Device Seminar, Defense Research Institute (1992).

· "Bad Faith Litigation," Open Forum (1989), IADC.

· "Hostile Jurisdictions," Pro Te: Solutio, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2-5 (January 2008).

(601) 985-4523
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Drug and Medical Device
  • Product Liability Law
  • Mass Torts
  • Professional Liability Law

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Attorney

Admission Details

Admitted in 1977, Mississippi
U.S. District Courts, Mississippi: Northern and Southern Districts
U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit, 10th Circuit
Admitted pro hac vice in many states around the country
U.S. Supreme Court

Law School Attended

University of Arkansas
Class of 1977
J.D.
with high honors, Managing Editor, Arkansas Law Review

University Attended

University of Arkansas
Class of 1974
B.A.
Phi Beta Kappa

Contact Information

Phone

(601) 985-4523

Email

Send email to Christy D. Jones


Office Information
Christy D. Jones
Attorney
Renaissance at Colony Park 1020 Highland Colony Parkway, Suite 1400, P.O. Box 6010,
Ridgeland, MS 39157

Loading...

Logo
Butler Snow LLP (Ridgeland, Mississippi)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.