Thomas B. Davidson

Attorney in Richmond, VA

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Residential Real Estate
  • Real Estate Finance
  • Real Estate Exchanges
  • Real Property Development
  • Business Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Contracts


Overall Client Rating

in Real Estate
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 06/06/13
Posted by a Consumer on 06/06/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I've worked with Tommy for about 25 years with my real estate issues. I have also called on him about other issues and he has always referred me to someone who was wonderful. Tommy is the only attorney I call whether it be real estate or any other legal matter. He has never failed to assist me in the most beneficial manner. Thank God for Tommy - he is honest and trustworthy.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1966, Virginia

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Richmond
    Class of 1966
    Phi Delta Phi

    University Attended

    Hampden-Sydney College
    Class of 1963

    Birth Information

    Born in 1939
    Richmond, Virginia, September 7, 1939

    Associations & Memberships

    Richmond Bar Association; Virginia State Bar.

    Contact Information






    Send email to Thomas B. Davidson

    Office Information
    Thomas B. Davidson
     701 East Franklin Street, Suite 1200,
    Richmond, VA 23219-2501


    Beale, Davidson, Etherington & Morris, P.C. (Richmond, Virginia)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.